FISICA/MENTE

 

http://it.geocities.com/comedonchisciotte/wta.html 

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer


Gli israeliani danzanti.


THE DANCING ISRAELIS



Like most Americans, I was gripped by senses of profound shock, horror, revulsion, sadness, and rage as I watched the horror of September 11, 2001 unfolding live on my television screen.  Watching the mass murder of thousands of innocent people live on television was the most upsetting experience of my life. How could any person of sound moral character not be enraged at witnessing this horrific act of barbarism?  To read about some faraway, long-ago genocide in a newspaper or a book is distressing enough. But to actually witness the mass murders of what was, at first, believed to have been tens of thousands of innocent people is truly heart stopping and traumatic. I  barely slept for two nights afterwards and suffered nightmares. Polling data would later reveal that 65% of Americans actually shed tears on 9-11.
But not all of the eye-witnesses to the 9-11 slaughter were so saddened.

L’11/09 cinque veterani dell’esercito israeliano furono arrestati dall’FBI dopo che alcuni osservatori li avevano visti ballare e festeggiare mentre prendevano foto del disastro del World Trade Center.

On September 11, five Israeli army veterans were arrested by the FBI  after several witnesses saw them "dancing", "high-fiving", and "celebrating"  as they took pictures of the World Trade Center disaster from across the river in New Jersey. Steven Gordon was the lawyer who volunteered to represent the five Israelis. He was asked by a Hebrew newspaper why the five men were being detained by the FBI. Here’s what Gordon told Yediot America:

"On the day of the disaster, three of the five boys went up on the roof of the building where the company office is located," said Gordon. "I'm not sure if they saw the twin towers collapse, but, in any event, they photographed the ruins right afterwards. One of the neighbors who saw them called the police and claimed they were posing, dancing and laughing, against the background of the burning towers….

"Anyhow, the three left the roof, took an Urban truck, and drove to a parking lot, located about a five-minute drive from the offices. They parked, stood on the roof of the truck to get a better view of the destroyed towers and took photographs. A woman who was in the building above the lot testified that she saw them smiling and exchanging high-fives. She and another neighbor called the police and reported on Middle-Eastern looking people dancing on the truck. They copied and reported the license plates.

Quando le foto furono sviluppate, esse dimostrarono che gli israeliani “danzanti” stavano ridendo di fronte al massacro di New York. In aggiunta ad altri comportamenti oltraggiosi e altamente sospetti, i cinque erano in possesso di taglierini, passaporti europei e 4700 $ in contanti nascosti in una calza.

When the photos were developed, they revealed that the dancing Israelis were smiling in the foreground of the New York massacre.According to ABC’s 20/20 attempted whitewash of the incident, in addition to their outrageous and highly suspicious  behavior, the five also had in their possession the following items; box-cutters, European passports, and $4700 cash hidden in a sock.

Why were these Israeli agents so happy about the horrible massacre that was unfolding right before their very eyes? What evil spirit could possess people who are supposed to be America's "allies", and who receive billions of dollars  in financial and military aid from US taxpayers each year , to publicly rejoice as innocent people (including many American jews) were burning to death and jumping out of 110 story buildings?  Could it be that these happy Israeli army veterans were in some way linked to this monstrous attack? That’s what officials close to the investigation initially told The Bergen Record newspaper of New Jersey.  

Quanto ridicolo, incredibile e paranoico possa essere per te, certi elementi entro il governo israeliano, e in particolare nel movimento sionista, hanno una lunga storia di attacchi agli USA (incolpando gli arabi) allo scopo di ottenere il supporto degli USA stessi. Prima di cominciare a parlare del 9/11 è importante rivedere alcuni avvenimenti precedenti che riguardano Israele e il Sionismo internazionale messi in atto allo scopo di manipolare gli americani (e altre nazioni).

As incredible, as ridiculous, and as "paranoid" as that belief may appear to you at this point, the fact is that certain elements within the Israeli government, and Zionist movement in general, have a long history of attacking the USA and framing Arabs in order to gain support from the US. Before we begin to piece together what really transpired on 9-11, it is absolutely critical that we first review some historical precedents regarding Israel's and International Zionism's treacherous history of manipulating America (and other nations) for their own selfish purposes. Without a basic understanding of this history, it would be impossible to understand the truth as it is today. So put aside your preconceived notions, your psychological defense mechanisms, and your prejudices,  and step into my time machine for a journey down the memory hole.


Il sionismo e la I guerra mondiale


ZIONISM AND WORLD WAR I


In the latter part of the 1800's, there arose in Europe a political movement known as "Zionism".

La parola Sionismo si riferisce in particolare allo sforzo di alcuni ebrei di creare una nazione ebraica in Palestina. Oggi si intende quelli ebrei che vogliono estendere i confini già stabiliti,a spese dei palestinesi cui le terre appartenevano. In un senso più generale il termine sionista è anche usato per descrivere un certo elemento entro la comunità ebraica che crede nella Supremazia Ebraica.

Zionism in particular referred to the effort among certain jews to establish a jewish nation in the land of Palestine. Today, the term Zionism is more commonly applied to those jews who want to expand the borders of what was already established, at the expense of the Palestinians who once owned the land. In a more general sense, the term "Zionist" is also  used to describe a certain element within the jewish community (not all of them!), who believe in Jewish Supremacy, thus putting their own interests ahead of those of the nation in which they reside.

E’ un errore credere che tutti gli ebrei sono a favore della Mafia Sionista o della Supremazia Ebraica. Infatti alcune delle più forti condanne della mafia ebraica e della Supremazia Ebraica viene dagli stessi ebrei (come John Sack, Alfred Lilienthal, Noam Chomsky, Israel Shahak, Benjamin Freedman, e Victor Ostrovsky, per citarne alcuni).

It is a mistake to assume that all jews are supporters of the "Zionist Mafia" or Jewish Supremacy. In fact, some of the strongest condemnations of Zionism and Jewish Supremacy comes from jews themselves!  There exists an enormous collection of hard-hitting anti-Zionist writings compiled by such notable jewish authors, historians, and journalists as John Sack, Alfred Lilienthal, Noam Chomsky,   Israel Shahak, Benjamin Freedman, and Victor Ostrovsky just to name a few. There is even a jewish religious group called "Neturei Karta, Jews United Against Zionism.". For their brave efforts, these men have had to tolerate vicious abuse  from Zionist smear groups like the Anti Defamation League (ADL) - an organization which actually specializes in defamation!. So let us put to rest now and forever the slanderous lie, and strategic Zionist propaganda ploy, that labels anyone who dares to call attention to the dangers of  the Zionist Mafia  is an "anti-semite", a "hatemonger",  or a "skin-head".

Nel 1800 i sionisti avevano uno ostacolo riguardo il loro schema sulla palestina araba. La Palestina infatti era sotto la sovranità dell’impero turco ottomano. Vi erano pochi ebrei che vivevano in Palestina e gli ebrei non controllavano la Palestina dai tempi dell’impero romano. Questo distrugge il comune mito che ebrei e arabi combattessero da secoli su quel suolo per la conquista di quella terra.

Now the Zionists of the late 1800’s faced one small problem with their bold takeover scheme of Arab Palestine. Palestine was under the sovereignty of the Ottoman Turkish Empire and the Arabs certainly weren't about to just give away prime real estate in Palestine to the Zionists of Europe. There were very few jews even living in Palestine and the jews had not controlled Palestine since the days of the Roman Empire. This destroys the commonly believed myth that the Arabs and the jews "have been fighting over that land for centuries".

Gli ebrei arabi che vivevano su quella terra non espressero mai il desiderio di sconfiggere i governanti ottomani e creare una nazione chiamata Israele.

The handful of Arab jews who lived in Palestine got along well with their Muslim hosts and never expressed any desire whatsoever to overthrow the Ottoman rulers and set up a nation called Israel.

Il movimento per strappare la palestina dall’impero ottomano veniva dai sionisti europei, influenti all’interno di molti stati.

The movement to strip Palestine away from the Ottoman Empire came strictly from European Zionists who had become very influential within several European nations.

Una opportunità si delineò alla I guerra mondiale quando Germania, Austria e Impero Ottomano finirono con lo scontrarsi con Inghilterra, Francia e Russia; i Sionisti misero tutto il loro impegno nel portare nel conflitto gli USA, un paese che non aveva alcun interesse vitale nella guerra.

As fate (or perhaps design) would have it, a great opportunity would soon present itself to the Zionist Mafia. There came in 1914 "The Great War" pitting the three powers of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Turkish Empire against the three powers of England, France, and Russia. In the interests of staying on the subject of 9-11 and today's "War on Terrorism", we won't get into all of the underlying causes or the historical flow of World War I. What we need to understand is that the Zionists played an important role in dragging the USA into that bloody European war -  a war in which the US had no vital interests at stake whatsoever.

Nel 1916 la guerra era praticamente vinta dalla coalizione Austria-Germania-Impero Ottomano.

Here was the situation. By 1916, the Germans, Austrians, and Ottoman Turks had seemingly won the war. Russia was in turmoil and about to be swallowed up by communist revolution. France had suffered horrible losses, and Britain was under a German U-boat blockade. Germany made an offer to Britain to end the war under conditions favorable to Britain. But the British, and the international Zionists, had one more card to play!

Gli Inglesi e i Sionisti giocarono allora un’altra carta: guidati dal loro principale rappresentante Chaim Weizmann (che diventerà il primo presidente di Israele) i Sionisti usarono la loro influenza per trascinare i titubanti USA nella guerra a fianco degli inglesi. In cambio dell’aiuto fornito per l’ingresso in guerra degli USA, gli inglesi avrebbero ricompensato i sionisti fornendo loro il possesso della Palestina, una volta sconfitti gli ottomani.

The British government and the Zionist leaders struck a dirty deal. The Zionists were led by Chaim Weizmann, the man who one day become the first President of the State of Israel. The idea was for the Zionists to use their influence to drag the mighty USA into the war on Britain's side, so that Germany and it's Ottoman allies could be crushed. In exchange for helping to bring the USA into the war, the British would reward the Zionists by taking over Palestine from the conquered Ottomans after the war was over.

Inizialmente gli Inglesi avrebbero voluto fornire una terra ebraica nel continente africano. Ma i Sionisti pretesero la Palestina. Una volta in possesso degli inglesi, gli ebrei d’Europa sarebbero emigrati in Palestina in gran numero.

The British had originally wanted to give the Zionists a jewish homeland in an African territory. But the Zionists were fixated on claiming Palestine as their land. Once under British control, the jews of Europe would be allowed to immigrate to Palestine in great numbers.

Alcuni intermediari sionisti quali Bernard Baruch, Louis Brandeis, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff, e molti altri si misero al lavorare intorno al presidente Woodrow Wilson e influenzarono la stampa trasformando il kaiser tedesco e il suo popolo in gente assetata di sangue,determinata a distruggere la civiltà. Nel 1916 gli USA, con l’aiuto dell’incidente della Lusitania, entrarono in guerra a fianco degli inglesi sotto il pretesto ridicolo di “salvare il mondo per la democrazia”.

Zionists powerbrokers such as Bernard Baruch, Louis Brandeis, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff, and many others immediately went to work to put the screws to President Woodrow Wilson. The Zionist influenced press, quickly transformed the German Kaiser and his people into bloodthirsty "Huns", determined to destroy civilization.  In 1916, the US, with the help of the Lusitania "incident", entered the war on Britain's side under the ridiculous pretext of "making the world safe for democracy".

Nello stesso tempo in Germania – dove i Sionisti detenevano influenze importanti nella stampa e nell’industria – l’entusiasmo per la guerra era annacquato dagli interventi della stampa sionista. Gli scioperi dei lavoratori in tempo di guerra erano organizzati dai capi sionisti e marxisti. Con il ramo tedesco della mafia internazionale sionista che minava la Germania dall’interno, e i rami inglese e americano che spingevano gli Usa in guerra, le sorti del conflitto volsero a sfavore degli imperi ottomano, tedesco e austriaco che videro ridisegnati i loro confini al trattato di Versailles nel 1918. Oltre ai numerosi banchieri sionisti presenti al congresso, i sionisti avevano anche una propria delegazione guidata da Chaim Weizmann.

Meanwhile in Germany - where Zionists also wielded tremendous influence in the press and industry-  enthusiasm for the war was suddenly watered  down by Zionist run newspapers. Wartime labor-strikes in German weapons factories were organized by Zionist and Marxist union leaders. With the German branch of the International Zionist Mafia undermining Germany from within, and the English and American branches of the Zionist mafia pushing America to join the war, it wasn't long before the German, Austrian, and Ottoman Empires were defeated and their maps rewritten by the victorious powers at the infamous Treaty of Versailles in 1918. In addition to the numerous Zionist bankers who were influencing Versailles, the Zionists also had their own delegation which was headed by Chaim Weizmann.

La Gran Bretagna con la dichiarazione Balfour del Novembre 1917 permetteva agli ebrei di emigrare nella Palestina conquistata agli Ottomani promettendo alla stesso tempo di preservare i diritti degli Arabi. Gli Arabi che vivono in Palestina non avevano comprato queste promesse e protestarono ma niente fermò l’immigrazione degli ebrei.

Great Britain issued the Balfour Declaration in November 1917, the same month that Germany surrendered. But it had actually been prepared 20 months earlier in March 1916 with Weizmann's influence. The Declaration allowed mass jewish immigration to conquered Palestine while promising to preserve Arab rights. The Arabs living in Palestine weren't buying these promises. They protested, but there was nothing that they could do to stop the coming wave of jewish immigration. This was the first step in creating what was to later become the state of Israel 20 years later.

 

Alcuni anni dopo, un sionista americano, milionario, Benjamin Freedman, ruppe con i suoi compagni sionisti. Benjamin Freedman era il principale proprietario della Woodbury Soap Company, fu uno dei sionisti presente a Versailles, ebbe contati con presidenti USA. Si disgustò del comportamento criminale della mafia sionista e dedicò molto tempo e denaro per esporre la verità sulle guerre mondiali e sull’azione sionista in America. Secondo Freedman, Wilson era stato ricattato con la minaccia di diffondere notizie su una vecchia storia extramatrimoniale in cui era coinvolto quando presidente dell’Università di Princetown.


Years after the war, an American Zionist millionaire named Benjamin Freedman broke ranks with his fellow Zionists and turned against them. Benjamin Freedman was the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company and was one of the many Zionists present at the Treaty of Versailles. Freedman was very well connected and had enjoyed access to several US presidents. Freedman grew disgusted with the criminal behavior of the Zionist mafia and dedicated much of his life and fortune to exposing the truth about both World Wars and the Zionist grip on America. According to Freedman, Wilson had been blackmailed by Zionists with the threat of a public disclosure of an old extramarital affair Wilson had when he was president of Princeton University.
Freedman's voluminous (and buried) writings and books on this subject are essential reading.  One leader of the jewish Anti Defamation League - Arnold Forster- once described Freedman as a "self-hating jew."  We may debate as to exactly what extent this Zionist-British dirty deal was responsible for dragging the sons of America off to die in a European bloodbath. Some, such as Freedman, believe it was the only reason that the US entered the war. Others, such as this writer, believe it was a primary contributing factor. But let us at this point agree on this one irrefutable point: the Zionists had no aversion to seeing Americans die for their own selfish interests.  

Anche l’Enciclopedia Britannica e l’Enciclopedia Microsoft Encarta confermano questi fatti. Qui è riportato un estratto dalla Microsoft Incarta: “La dichiarazione Balfour fu una lettera preparata nel Marzo 1916 e pubblicata nel Novembre 1917 durante la I guerra mondiale, dallo statista inglese Arthur James Balfour, allora ministro degli esteri….in particolare la lettera esprimeva l’approvazione del Sionismo da parte del governo inglese con lo “stabilire in Palestina una nazione per la gente ebraica”.

Even the Encyclopedia Britannica and Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia (look under "Balfour Declaration) confirm this little known fact of World War I. Here's the excerpt from Microsoft Encarta:
THE BALFOUR DECLARATION. "The Balfour Declaration was a letter prepared in March 1916 and issued in November 1917, during World War I, by the British statesman Arthur James Balfour, then foreign secretary....Specifically, the letter expressed the British government's approval of Zionism with "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people." The letter committed the British government to making the "best endeavors to facilitate t
he achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done to prejudice the rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine." "The immediate purpose was to win for the Allied cause in World War I the support of Jews in the warring nations and in the United States. As a result of the Balfour Declaration, Israel was established as an independent state in 1948 in the mandated area."

Occorre anche ricordare che con il trattato di Versailles vennero create molte piccole nazioni come il regno del Kuwait, ricco di petrolio, tagliando via una fetta di costa meridionale dall’Iraq, che sempre lo ha rivendicato come una propria provincia.

It's also worth mentioning at this point that when the British dismantled the Ottoman Empire after World War I, they created many smaller nations. The oil rich, puppet kingdom of Kuwait was formed by slicing off the southern coastal tip of what we now know as the nation of Iraq. As a result of this arbitrary redrawing of the Ottoman map, a bitter conflict was created between Iraq and Kuwait. Iraq has always considered Kuwait as its true southern province. This is what ultimately led to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1991 and the Gulf War.  


Il Sionismo e la 2a guerra mondiale
ZIONISM AND WORLD WAR II


Let us fast forward our time machine to the early 1930's. Again, there is no need for a detailed analysis and debate of  the causes and major events of World War II. The purpose here is to again illustrate yet another case of selfish Zionist agitation for American entry into a war.


Il popolo tedesco manteneva risentimenti verso gli ebrei riconoscendo ai sionisti un ruolo importante nella sconfitta della 1 guerra mondiale, inoltre si risentiva verso le brutali riparazioni in denaro imposte da certi banchieri sionisti presenti al trattato di Versailles. Privati di terre precedentemente tedesche e con l’economia in rovina, elessero Adolf Hitler come loro capo cancelliere. Hitler e il partito nazista tolsero dall’influenza sionista i mezzi di stampa, le banche e le università.

The German people were bitterly resentful of not only the Zionist role in bringing about their defeat in World War I,  but also over the brutal monetary reparations which had been imposed upon them by certain Zionist bankers who helped craft the brutal Treaty of Versailles after the war. Stripped of formerly German territory, and with the German economy in ruins, the people of Germany elected Adolf Hitler as their Chancellor leader. Hitler and the Nazi party soon seized control of the German media, banks, and universities away from the influential Zionists who reigned supreme in those institutions.

Contemporaneamente, i sionisti di tutto il mondo cominciarono ad agitarsi contro la Germania, con il boicottaggio delle importazioni e una pressione su GB e USA a prendere una immediata azione contro la Germania. Il 24 Marzo 1933, il giornale inglese Daily Express riportò “La giudea dichiara guerra alla Germania. Ebrei di tutto il mondo uniti nell’azione”.

Almost immediately, Zionists all over the world began to agitate for action against Germany. Boycotts of German imports were imposed and calls for the UK and USA to take immediate action against Germany began to emanate from Zionist circles. On March 24, 1933, The Daily Express of England carried the bold headline; "Judea Declares War on Germany. Jews of All the World Unite in Action." The front page story revealed that the Zionists had announced a concerted worldwide effort to isolate Germany and turn other nations against her.

L’anno successivo, il capo politico sionista, Vladimir Jabotinksy, scriveva: “Noi incominceremo una guerra spirituale e materiale del mondo contro la Germania. Gli interessi degli ebrei chiamano per la completa distruzione della Germania”

The following year, Zionist political leader Vladimir Jabotinksy wrote:
"The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every continent...We shall start a spiritual and material war of the world against Germany. Our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany."

Alcuni anni dopo, Lord Beaverbrook, un magnate della carta stampata inglese, sottolinea l’influenza sionista sulla stampa inglese: “Ci sono 20000 ebrei tedeschi che sono venuti in Inghilterra. Tutti lavorano contro un accordo con la Germania. Gli ebrei hanno qui raggiunto una grossa posizione nell’editoria. La loro influenza ci sta portando verso la guerra”.

A few years later,  Lord Beaverbrook, a British newspaper magnate issued this warning about the Zionist influence over the British press. Beaverbrook warned:
"There are 20,000 German Jews who have come here to England. They all work against an agreement with Germany. The Jews have got a big position in the press here. Their political influence is driving us into the direction of war."

Nel 1939, Germania e Polonia entrarono in guerra per la disputa di un territorio tolto alla Germania nel trattato di Versailles nel 1918. Sotto la pretesa di proteggere la Polonia, Gran Bretagna e Francia dichiararono immediatamente guerra alla Germania. La predizione di Beaverbrooks si era rivelata esatta.

In 1939, Germany and Poland went to war over disputed territory that was taken away from Germany by the Versailles Treaty of 1918. Under the phony pretext of protecting Poland, Great Britain and France immediately declared war on Germany. Beaverbrook’s prediction was realized.

Negli USA, la mafia Sionista cominciò di nuovo a lavorare sul Presidente. I nomi dei giocatori erano cambiati ma il gioco era lo stesso.Toccava a Franklin Delano Roosevelt portare gli Usa in un’altra guerra europea. Patrioti americani quali l’aviatore Charles Lindbergh cercarono di mettere in guardia gli americani: “Io non attacco gli ebrei. Sto dicendo che i capi delle razze inglese e ebraica, per ragioni a loro note, per ragioni che non sono americane,vogliono coinvolgerci in una guerra”.


In the United States,  the Zionist Mafia again went to work on a US president. The names of the players had changed but the game was still the same. It was Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s turn to deliver the US into another European war. Patriotic Americans such as famed aviator Charles Lindbergh saw this and tried to warn the American people that Zionist media influence was intending to drive us into another World War. Said Lindbergh:
"I am not attacking the Jewish people.  But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.
"

A causa del forte sentimento antiguerra degli americani, sia il presidente che gli alleati sionisti avevano difficoltà nel procedere verso la guerra. Allora venne in soccorso un altro incidente: Pearl Harbor nel 1941. Giappone e Germania erano legati da un accordo di mutua difesa: la guerra al Giappone significava automaticamente guerra alla Germania. Roosvelt impedì l’apporto di petrolio al Giappone nella speranza di forzarlo ad attaccare Pearl Harbor. Evidenze chiare, presenti nei documenti governativi, indicano che Roosvelt aveva avanzate conoscenze dell’attacco dei giapponesi e permise che esso avvenisse.

Because of strong public anti-war sentiment, FDR and his Zionist allies had a hard time dragging the US into the European war. Then another  "incident" came along at Pearl Harbor in 1941. Japan and Germany were bound to a mutual defense agreement, which meant that war with Japan would automatically mean war with Germany.  FDR embargoed Japan’s oil supply in the hopes of forcing Japan to attack Pearl Harbor.  Overwhelming evidence from government documents clearly shows that FDR had advance knowledge of the Japanese attack and allowed it to happen so that he could drag the US into World War II.

Come nella prima guerra, l’entrata degli Usa nella seconda significava la sconfitta della Germania. Alcune ore prima di commettere il suicidio, il 30 Aprile 1945, Hitler dettò il suo ultimo testamento, nel quale dava la responsabilità della seconda guerra ai Sionisti o come egli diceva al “ghetto internazionale e ai suoi paggi”. L’accusa finale ai sionisti è simile ai pensieri di Jabotinsky, Lindbergh, Beaverbrook, Joe Kennedy e altri: “Non è vero che io o qualcun altro in Germania abbiamo voluto la guerra nel 1939. Essa fu voluta e provocata solamente da statisti internazionali o di origine ebraica o al servizio degli interessi ebraici”.

As was the case in WW I, US entry the war meant another defeat of Germany. Hours before committing suicide on April 30, 1945,  Adolf Hitler dictated his last will and political testament. In it he placed responsibility for WW II on the Zionist Mafia - or, as he called it - "International Jewry and its henchmen". It's no surprise that Hitler would make such a claim. However, his final accusation of the Zionists does parallel the statements made by Jabotinsky, Lindbergh, Beaverbrook, Joe Kennedy, and many others. In the final writing of his life, Hitler wrote:
"It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish Origin or working for Jewish interests...Nor had I ever wished that after the appalling first World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America."  

Indipendentemente dal tuo punto di vista sulla 2a guerra mondiale, il punto essenziale che non può essere rifiutato è che i sionisti avevano di nuovo dimostrato che non provavano avversione a mandare gli americani a morire per i loro propri interessi.

Regardless of your view of World War II and whether or not the USA belonged in the fight, the essential point which cannot be refuted is again this: years before World War II had even started, the Zionists had yet again demonstrated that they had no aversion to sending Americans to die for their own interests.

Il tradimento

GREAT BRITAIN'S TURN TO BE BETRAYED

Era l’Inghilterra che aveva conquistato la Palestina e aveva permesso agli ebrei di emigrare in quelle terre. Ma con la Gran Bretagna indebolita e indebitata dalla guerra gli ingrati terroristi sionisti colsero l’occasione di cacciarla dalla Palestina con vari attentati. Il più noto dei gruppi terroristi era l’Irgun, il cui capo Menachem Begin diventerà un giorno primo ministro israeliano.

A few years after the end of World War II, the Zionist plan to establish the nation of Israel in Palestine was finally realized. But not before the British protectors of Palestine were chased out by acts of  terror carried out by ungrateful Zionist terrorists. It was the British who had taken Palestine away from Arab control and allowed the jews of Europe to immigrate there. But with Great Britain weakened and in debt from the war, the ungrateful Zionists saw their opportunity to chase the British out of Palestine by committing acts of terrorism against them. The most notorious of the Zionist terror groups was the Irgun, whose leader Menachem Begin would one day go on to become Prime Minister of Israel!

La mattina del 22 Luglio 1946, 15-20 terroristi Irgun travestiti da arabi entrarono nell’Hotel King David di Gerusalemme (quartiere generale delle forze armate inglesi e sede del governatorato). Essi nascondevano 225 Kg di esplosivo nei contenitori del latte. L’esplosione distrusse parte dell’Hotel e uccise 91 persone, per la maggior parte inglesi. Anche 15 innocenti ebrei vi morirono, provando il fatto che i sionisti radicali sono capaci di uccidere i compagni ebrei pur di far avanzare la loro causa.

On the morning of July 22, 1946, of 15-20 Irgun terrorists dressed as Arabs entered the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. They unloaded 225 kilograms of explosives hidden in milk churns.The King David Hotel housed the Secretariat of the Government of Palestine and Headquarters of the British Forces in Palestine. When a British officer became suspicious, a shootout took place and the Irgun lit the fuses and fled. The explosion destroyed part of the hotel and killed 91 people. Most of the victims were British but 15 innocent jews also died, proving that radical Zionists are capable of even killing fellow jews in order to advance their cause.

La banda terroristica degli Irgun colpiva anche gli arabi allo scopo di far abbandonare le loro terre. Il più conosciuto di questi massacri accadde nel villaggio di Deir Yassin la mattina del 9 aprile 1948: più di 100 arabi, compresi donne e bambini,vennero sistematicamente uccisi dagli uomini di Menachem Begin.

The Irgun terror gang also targeted Arab civilians in order to frighten them into evacuating their land. The most well known of these massacres happened at the village of Deir Yassin on the morning of April 9, 1948. More than 100 Arabs, including women and children were systematically slaughtered by Menachem Begin's murderous gang.The Israelis took over whatever villages the terrorized Arabs fled from.

Nel 1948 gli Inglesi ne avevano abbastanza della Palestina. Sotto l’influenza della lobby Sionista, l’ONU, la GB e gli USA riconobbero la nazione di Israele. Uno dei primi atti del governo israeliano fu la “legge del ritorno” che dava il diritto a qualunque ebreo, ovunque abitasse, di andare in Israele e diventarne cittadino. Naturalmente gli Arabi non furono contenti di questo: vi furono varie guerre, vinte dagli israeliani e dalla loro più potente macchina da guerra fornita dagli USA. L’ironia della legge del ritorno è che molti degli ebrei di oggi non hanno alcun legame  ancestrale con gli ebrei del Vecchio Testamento. Molti, forse la maggior parte sono discendenti dei Khazars, una popolazione i cui capi si convertirono al giudaismo intorno all’800 aC. I Khazars mai avevano messo piede in Palestina.

By 1948, the British had had enough of Palestine. Under intense Zionist lobbying, the UN, the UK and the US recognized the nation of Israel in 1948. One of the first acts of the new Israeli government was to pass "the law of return", which gives any jew in the world the right to move to Israel and become a citizen. Understandably, the Arab nations weren't too pleased about this. There would be a several wars that followed. But the Israelis and their free arsenal of America’s finest weapons kept the Arabs from reclaiming their land. The Arabs have never been a match for the US supplied Israeli war machine. The irony of "the law of return" is that many of today's jews have no direct ancestral link to the jews of the Old Testament. Many, perhaps even most jewish people are descended from the Khazars, a people whose rulers converted to Judaism sometime during the 800's AD.The Khazars never even set foot in Palestine!

The brutal and criminal circumstances surrounding the creation of Israel are now a half century in the past. Even most Arabs understand that Israel isn't going to go away. But by reviewing this real history, we can better understand the deceptive, dangerous, and brutal nature of Zionism today.


 

Parte 2  

L'AMERICA DIVENTA UNA PROSTITUTA SIONISTA

AMERICA BECOMES THE ZIONIST'S WHORE  

Dopo aver utilizzato Germania e Inghilterra, l’attenzione dei sionisti si rivolge alla rimanente grande potenza mondiale, gli USA. L’autore analizza alcuni episodi: nel 1955 agenti israeliani travestiti da arabi vengono catturati mentre collocano ordigni presso istallazioni americane in Egitto (affare Lavon), nel 1967 una nave disarmata statunitense, la USS Liberty, viene attaccata da navi e jet israeliani causando l’assassinio di 35 marinai e il ferimento di altri 170, in pieno giorno con la flotta aerea americana nelle vicinanze (l’intento era addossare la colpa sugli egiziani: la testimonianza agghiacciante dei sopravvissuti sconfessò comunque quell’intento; il Congresso degli USA non ha mai aperto un’inchiesta sull’accaduto); nel 1989 attentato ad un night club tedesco con uccisione di cittadini americani del quale furono accusati i libici (è a causa di questa azione che il Presidente Reagan bombardò la Libia con l’uccisione della figlia di Muamar Qadaffi; (la Francia non permise il passaggio sulla sua terra degli aerei americani perchè l’Intelligence francese era a conoscenza dei veri colpevoli). Victor Ostrosvky abbandonò successivamente il Mossad e rivelò: la colpa del Mossad nell’attentato, l’uso di agenti arabi per compiere determinate missioni, il travestimento in arabi degli agenti israeliani, il piano del Mossad per far cambiare l’opinione pubblica contro l’Iraq, l’utilizzo di sionisti americani in questi piani.

We have reviewed how the Zionists used and discarded Germany. Then they used and discarded Great Britain. After World War II, it was clear that the chief remaining global power was the United States. Now the USA had never had any problem with the Arab people, and had no reason to quarrel with the Arabs. For the Zionists to maintain and expand the support they were receiving from America, it would benefit them greatly if the Arabs and the mighty US could somehow become enemies. Could the Zionists possibly stoop so low? Why not? Look at what they had already pulled off!  Remember that the official motto of the Mossad (Israeli's intelligence organization) is "by way of deception thou shalt do war."  In 1955, one of these "false flag" operations was publicly exposed for the world to see. Israeli agents, impersonating Arab terrorists, were caught staging a series of bombings against American installations in Egypt. When this conspiracy was exposed, it ultimately created such a controversy that it brought down the Israeli government. The long since forgotten scandal became known as "the Lavon Affair". Then again during a 1967 war with the Arabs, Israeli gunboats and fighter jets deliberately attacked the USS Liberty, an unarmed US communications ship. Thirty five American sailors were murdered and 170 others injured in a prolonged Israeli onslaught - carried out in broad daylight and with the U.S. flag flying prominently. The intent was to kill all of the Americans and then leave the Egyptians to take the blame. Israel denied that the attack was deliberate but the chilling stories of the lucky American survivors clearly contradicts that lie. To this very day, the U.S. Congress has never investigated the USS Liberty massacre. In 1989, the Israelis once again succeeded in framing enemy Arabs in order to enrage America. Former Mossad case officer Victor Ostrosvky became so disgusted with the criminal behavior of his own government that he defected from the Mossad and tried to warn America of just how evil and dangerous they were. Ostrovsky revealed exactly how the Israelis framed Libya for the bombing of a German night club which killed American servicemen. It was this frame up job that caused President Reagan to bomb Libya, killing the 4 year old daughter of Libyan leader Muamar Qadaffi. France refused to allow US bombers to fly over their air space and bomb Libya  because French intelligence knew that Libya was unjustly framed by the Israelis. Among some of Ostrovosky's other amazing revelations are: that the Mossad often uses Arab agents to carry out missions, that Israeli agents are skilled at impersonating Arabs, that Mossad had a plan to turn American public opinion against Iraq, and that wealthy Zionists in America are often called upon to help carry out Mossad missions. Ostrovsky, whose tell all book, By Way of Deception,  infuriated the Mossad and made him the target of numerous death threats. 

Nel 2001, il Washington Times pubblica una relazione dell’Army School of Advanced Military Studies che in riferimento all’esercito israeliano afferma trattarsi di “un gorilla del peso di 500 pound, ben armato e equipaggiato, che opera   in Gaza e nel West Bank, conosciuto come trasgressore delle leggi internazionali per raggiungere le proprie missioni” mentre sul Mossad afferma che “ha la capacità di colpire forze americane e far apparite questo come un attacco arabo palestinese”.


In 2001, the Washington Times ran a story about a 68 page research paper issued by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS). The research was compiled by 60 US Army officers as an attempt to predict the possible outcomes of deploying a US  force to maintain peace between the Israel and Palestinians. Here’s what SAMS had to say about the Israeli military machine: "a 500 pound gorilla in Israel. Well armed and trained. Operates in both Gaza and the West Bank. Known to disregard international law to accomplish mission"  Leggi   Of Israel’s Mossad, the officers issued this warning: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian Arab act." Leggi  

Perché gli USA, che hanno un debito di trilioni di dollari, danno via bilioni di dollari a un governo straniero i cui militari violano le leggi internazionali e il cui Mossad è capace di assassinare truppe americane per addossare la colpa agli arabi?


Why does the US, which is trillions of dollars in debt, gives away billons of taxpayer dollars to a foreign government whose military violates international laws and whose Mossad is capable of murdering US troops in order to frame Arabs? Have we lost our minds?




La struttura del potere sionista in USA
ZIONIST POWER STRUCTURE IN AMERICA


Perfino i sionisti stessi non hanno mai negato di avere influenzato a lungo gli USA. Ma ciò che noi dobbiamo capire è che i sionisti non influenzano semplicemente la politica USA….essi la dominano! Questa affermazione è stata resa da molte personalità americane ed è facilmente verificabile. 

Now that we have established the ruthless and criminal nature of radical Zionism, one more lesson needs to be understood before we return to the five dancing Israelis of 9-11 and other related stories. Even the Zionists themselves have never denied that they have long exerted great influence in America. But what we must understand is that the Zionists do not merely influence United States policy....they dominate it!  It is this domination that enables them to pull off monstrous crimes and then conceal them from the general public. The observation that Zionists dominate the American media, government, academia, and Hollywood has been made by many prominent Americans and is easily verifiable by public information.

 
Henry Ford diceva: “Se dopo aver eletto il loro uomo o gruppo, non è resa obbedienza al controllo ebraico, allora rapidamente sentirai parlare di scandali, investigazioni e impeachment con lo scopo di rimuovere il disubbidiente. Le campagne per le elezione americane sono così ben orchestrate...che è già pronta una sufficiente documentazione di discredito verso i candidati che i capi ebrei possono usare in futuro all’occorrenza”.

Henry Ford said this: "If after having elected their man or group, obedience is not rendered to the Jewish control, then you speedily hear of "scandals" and "investigations" and "impeachments" for the removal of the disobedient. Usually a man with a "past" proves the most obedient instrument, but even a good man can often be tangled up in campaign practices that compromise him. It has been commonly known that Jewish manipulation of American election campaigns have been so skillfully handled, that no matter which candidate was elected, there was ready made a sufficient amount of evidence to discredit him in case his Jewish masters needed to discredit him." 

L’autore cita inoltre: Charles Lindbergh (“il più grande danno per il paese è la proprietà e l’influenza ebraica nei film, nei giornali, radio e nel governo”), l’ammiraglio Thomas Moorer (“ottengono sempre quello che vogliono…Se il popolo americano conoscesse quale stretta hanno sul governo, si solleverebbero in armi”), il senatore William Fulbright (“Israele controlla il Senato degli Stati Uniti”), Patrick Buchanan (“Il Congresso degli Stati Uniti è un territorio occupato dagli Israeliani”) e infine il colloquio tra un capo religioso e il presidente Richard Nixon (all’osservazione dl primo che la stretta mortale sui mezzi di comunicazione da parte degli ebrei deve essere interrotta o questo paese andrà alla deriva, Nixon risponde “Non posso dirlo ma lo credo anch’io”).


Charles Lindbergh said this: "Their greatest danger to this country lies in the Jewish ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government.  Admiral Thomas Moorer, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff under Ronald Reagan said this: "I've never seen a President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to them [the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on." 
While a guest on ABC's Face the Nation,  William Fulbright - US Senator and Chairman of the US Foreign Relations committee - said this before a national television audience: "Israel controls the United States Senate. We should be more concerned about the United States' interests."
Nationally syndicated columnist and former presidential candidate Patrick Buchanan said: "The United States Congress is Israeli occupied territory."
And US religious leader Billy Graham and President Richard Nixon once had the following exchange, which was caught on tape:
GRAHAM: The Jewish stranglehold on the media has got to be broken or this country's going down the drain".
NIXON: "You believe that?"
GRAHAM: "Yes, sir."
NIXON: "Oh boy. So do I. I can't ever say that but I do believe it"  Leggi

Andiamo ai fatti del controllo sionista.

Fatto: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, UPN, il Washington Post, il New York Times, il Wall Street Journal, il New York Daily News, Time Magazine, Newsweek, People Magazine, US News e World Report oltre a numerose altri media e compagnie di Hollywood hanno un controllo sionista, un capo redattore sionista, o appartengono ad una cordata che ha un controllo sionista. Hai mai notato come Hollywood dipinga i tedeschi e gli arabi come fanatici o terroristi? Ora sai perché!

But enough of quoting others. Let's look at the facts of Zionist control.
FACT: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, UPN, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Daily News, Time Magazine, Newsweek, People Magazine, US News and World Report and countless other media and Hollywood companies all have either a Zionist CEO, a Zionist News Chief, or are owned by a media conglomerate which has a Zionist CEO.  39   Have you ever noticed how Hollywood movies always seem to portray Germans and Arabs as a bigoted fanatics or as terrorists? Now you know why!

FATTO: l’AIPAC è la più importante organizzazione lobbistica israeliana in Washington, capace di: rimuovere parlamentari che non esaudiscono le loro richieste (la maggioranza dei congressisti riceve generose donazioni dall’AIPAC: pari a milioni di dollari) e di intimidire giornalisti con una azione senza tregua (come riportato dal Nation Magazine). 

FACT: AIPAC, the Israeli lobbying organization, is the most feared lobby in Washington DC. By their own admission, they are capable of unseating Congressmen and Senators that do not carry out their requests. The majority of Congressmen from both  political parties receive large donations from AIPAC. Writing for the Nation Magazine, journalist Michael Massing explains: "AIPAC is widely regarded as the most powerful foreign-policy lobby in Washington. Its 60,000 members shower millions of dollars on hundreds of members of Congress on both sides of the aisle. Newspapers like the New York Times fear the Jewish lobby organizations as well. "It's very intimidating," said a correspondent at another large daily. "The pressure from these groups is relentless."  Leggi

FATTO: Il Pentagono è sotto il controllo di un sionista, Richard Perle (soprannominato “principe dell’oscurità”), ma vi sono anche altri sionisti come Kissinger, Cohen, Schlessinger. Con Perle, capo della Difesa, i sionisti Paul Wolfowitz e Douglass Feith, come sottosegretari, la forza sionista del Pentagono possiede i ¾ del comando civile sulle forze armate americane. Alcuni carrieristi come Condoleeza Rice e Donald Rumsfeld sono sotto la loro influenza o incapaci di opporsi alla 3° guerra mondiale. Il gruppo Perle-Wolfowitz-Feith rappresenta un “governo all’interno del governo”. In linea con le loro posizioni vi sono i senatori Joseph Lieberman e John McCain, il primo in corsa per le presidenziali del 2004, il secondo come partner.


FACT: The Pentagon is under the control of a hard core Zionist named Richard Perle. The civilian Defense Policy Board actually wields more control over the military establishment than the Defense Secretary or the generals and admirals. There are a number of other Zionists who serve on the board (Kissinger, Cohen, Schlessinger) as well as non-jewish members who have always supported Israel and the expansion of the "War on Terror". The notoriously belligerent Perle, nicknamed the "The Prince of Darkness",  is Chairman of the Board. With Perle as Chairman of the Defense Policy Board, Zionist Paul Wolfowitz as Undersecretary of Defense, and Zionist award winner Douglass Feith as Undersecretary of Defense Policy, the Zionist Pentagon gang controls 3 of the top 4 civilian leadership positions of America’s armed forces. Careerist scoundrels like Condoleeza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld are either under their influence or unwilling to oppose their drive for WW III. The Perle-Wolfowitz-Feith gang represent a fanatical and warmongering "government-within-a-government". In league with these Zionist Pentagon conspirators are jewish Zionist and potential 2004 Presidential candidate, Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) and his Gentile partner in crime Senator John McCain (R-AZ).

Un giornalista israeliano lamentandosi del duro trattamento riservato ai palestinesi affermava: “Noi crediamo….che ora, con la Casa Bianca e il senato nelle nostre mani, la vita (degli Arabi) non conti come la nostra. Il loro sangue non conta come il nostro. Noi crediamo con assoluta certezza che ora, quando abbiamo l’AIPAC e Edgard Bronfman e la Lega anti-diffamazione, noi abbiamo il diritto di dire a 400000 persone che in otto ore devono allontanarsi dalle loro case. E che noi abbiamo il diritto di gettare bombe sui loro villaggi e città…Che noi abbiamo il diritto di ucciderli senza colpa”.


An Israeli journalist named Ari Shavit, lamenting the harsh treatments that his government dishes out to the Palestinians, made the following observation in Ha'aretz, a leading Israeli journal: " We believe with absolute certitude that now, with the White House and Senate in our hands along with the Pentagon and the New York Times, the lives [of Arabs] do not count as much as our own. Their blood does not count as much as our blood. We believe with absolute certitude that now, when we have AIPAC [the Israel lobby] and [Edgar] Bronfman and the Anti-Defamation League, , we truly have the right to tell 400,000 people that in eight hours they must flee from their homes. And that we have the right to rain bombs on their villages and towns and populated areas. That we have the right to kill without any guilt."  Leggi

L’autore  sostiene che questa è solo un’analisi superficiale del potere sionista, di cui comunque sia i giornalisti che i politici hanno paura di parlare. E’ per questo che il presidente Clinton ha dovuto strisciare davanti agli ebrei e affermare in modo ridicolo: “Israele sa che se l’Irag o l’Iran attraversassero il fiume Giordano, io personalmente impugnerei un fucile, mi getterei in una trincea e combatterei e morirei”.

And this only scratches the surface of Zionist power! With such awesome power to control and cover up events, is it any wonder why so many of America's journalists and politicians are afraid to even talk about this issue? Is it any wonder why former President Bill Clinton would grovel before a jewish audience and say something as ridiculous as the following statement: "The Israelis know that if the Iraqi or the Iranian army came across the Jordan River, I would personally grab a rifle, get in a ditch, and fight and die."   
I could go on and on at much greater length about this subject, but I want to get back to the dancing Israelis. Have I made my point yet?
THE BUTCHER SHARON
I know. I know. You want to return to the scene of the dancing Israelis on 9-11. But there is one more quick lesson that needs to be covered before we climb back into the time machine and fast-forward back to 9-11. If we don’t cover this, you won’t be able to fully understand the "big picture".

Quindi l’autore passa in rassegna i recenti fatti storici. Durante la guerra del 1967 Israele occupò I territori del West Bank e di Gaza. Trentacinque anni dopo l’esercito israeliano continua l’umiliante occupazione di quei territori, che non sono parte della nazione di Israele, creata dall’ONU nel 1948. I Palestinesi oggi vogliono semplicemente che quella occupazione abbia termine. E’ questa occupazione, non la creazione dello stato di Israele che accende il conflitto oggi. Prima dell’attuale stato di cose, anche il popolo israeliano voleva la fine dell’occupazione: elessero come Primo Ministro Yitzak Rabin che si mosse nella direzione della pace. Gli anni 90 furono anni tranquilli per Israele.  Yasser Arafat e Rabin, sotto la mediazione degli USA, avevano finalmente raggiunto un accordo di pace. Tali speranze terminarono quando Rabin fu assassinato. Non fu un Arabo che uccise Rabin. Fu un fanatico sionista di nome Yigal Amir, studente di legge alla Università israeliana di Bar-Ilan.


During the 1967 war, Israel occupied the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and Gaza. Thirty five years have passed since that war ended, yet the Israeli army continues the humiliating occupation of those Palestinian areas. Those areas are not part of the nation of Israel that was created in 1948 by the UN. What the Palestinian people are resisting today is not the 1948 confiscation of their land. They simply want the 1967 occupation to end. It is this ongoing occupation, not the 1948 creation of Israel, which fuels the conflict today. Prior to the current outbreak of hostilities, the majority of the Israeli people also supported the end of Israel's occupation and oppression of these territories. They elected Yitzak Rabin as Prime Minister and Rabin made more strides towards achieving peace than any of his processors. The 1990's were a quiet years in Israel. Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and Prime Minister Rabin appeared to have finally reached a peace deal the US acting as the mediator.
This did not sit well with the hard core Zionists who ultimately hope to expand Israel's borders even more. Hopes for a lasting peace deal were soon dealt a major setback when a flurry of five  bullets were pumped into Prime Minister Rabin at close range as he was attending a 1995 Israeli peace rally. It was not an Arab that killed Rabin. It was a Zionist fanatic named Yigal Amir. Amir was a law student at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University. He later told investigators that he had no regrets for his actions. Amir, a bright young law student was willing to throw his life away in the service of  the Zionist cause. (More on that concept later on.)

Alla testa del governo israeliano oggi siede un uomo che fu ospite di onore alla Casa Bianca nell’Ottobre 2000 quando si insediò Gorge Bush. Il suo nome è Ariel Sharon, detto dai suoi supporter “Arik King", ma conosciuto dagli Arabi come terrorista e criminale di guerra. La sua carriera sembrava finita quando risultò che aveva organizzato come Ministro della difesa un massacro di palestinesi nel 1982. Le truppe di Sharon bloccarono le vie di uscita dai campi profughi di Sabra e Shatila, mentre una milizia libanese, alleata dei militari israeliani, entrarono nei campi uccidendo più di 1550 civili disarmati e violentando molte donne. Sebbene queste milizie fossero le responsabili materiali degli omicidi, erano le truppe di Sharon che impedirono la fuga dai campi, permettendo così il massacro. Tre della milizia libanese, subito dopo la loro testimonianza contro Sharon, vennero uccisi da uomini armati sconosciuti o da autobomba.

At the head of the Israeli government today sits a brutal man who has been a guest of honor at George Bush's White House on a regular basis since he took office in October 2000. His name is Ariel Sharon. His fanatical Zionist supporters in Israel refer to him as "Arik King", but the Arabs know him as a lifelong butcher, terrorist, and war criminal. There was a time when Sharon was disgraced and his political career seemed to be over. The isolation of Ariel Sharon was the result a 1982 Palestinian massacre which Sharon engineered when he was Israel's Defense minister. It was the Israelis themselves who forced Sharon to resign.
Sharon's troops blocked the exits from the Sabra and Shattila refugee camps while a Lebanese militia, allied with the Israeli military, went into the camps and slaughtered more than 1,500 unarmed Palestinian civilians while raping many women.  Though these Lebanese militias were the ones who did the actual killing, it was Ariel Sharon who controlled the militias and it was Sharon's soldiers who stood by and blocked the camp exits, deliberately allowing the slaughter to take place.
A survivor of the attack who had been raped and shot went to Belgium and initiated a war crimes case against Sharon. Several Lebanese militia leaders were summoned to testify against Sharon. Shortly before their testimony, three of them were suddenly killed by unknown gunmen and car bombs. Israel's Mossad of course denied any responsibility for the strange and untimely deaths of these three witnesses against Sharon. And if you believe that one, I’ll sell you the World Trade Center!

Dopo quasi 20 anni di politica nell’ombra, Sharon, nell’Ottobre del 2000, fece la sua ricomparsa. Sharon e un piccolo gruppo di soldati si mostrarono in un luogo sacro sia per i mussulmani che per gli ebrei. Questa fu una deliberata provocazione. Quando i mussulmani protestarono, le truppe israeliane intervennero e vi furono anche spari. In poche minuti, anni di sforzi di pace furono distrutti. La popolazione israeliana, spaventata, richiese un uomo forte per la sua protezione: Sharon fu eletto Primo Ministro. Armata e fondata dal Congresso Americano (in mano agli israeliani), la macchina da guerra israeliana può cancellare a volontà le case palestinesi. La sola arma in mano ai palestinesi sono le “bombe suicide”. Ad ogni suicidio, Sharon giustifica ancora maggiori attacchi e occupazioni di nuove terre, con lo scopo di espellere i palestinesi dal West Bank e da Gaza. Ma il piano sionista si scontrava con tre ostacoli: 1) L’opinione mondiale (prima dell’11/9 a favore dei Palestinesi); 2) L’opinione degli israeliani (la maggior parte dei quali volevano la pace); 3) L’Iraq di Saddam Hussein, da sempre a favore dei palestinesi. Quanto utile sarebbe stato un qualche “incidente” per modificare questi tre punti a proprio favore!

After nearly 20 years of political exile, Sharon made his comeback in October 2000. Knowing full well how much the Palestinians hated him for his role in the 1982 massacres, Sharon and a small army of Israeli soldiers showed up at the Temple Mount 47 - a site held sacred by both Muslims and jews. This was a deliberate provocation.  When the Muslims protested the Sharon provocation, the Israeli troops cracked down. Rocks were thrown and shots were fired. In just a matter of minutes, years of peace and the Israeli-Arab peace effort had been destroyed by Mr. Sharon’s bullying antics. When the fighting broke out, a frightened and propagandized Israeli population soon turned to a strong man for their protection - the very man who had deliberately instigated the  violence in the first place.  Ariel Sharon was elected Prime Minister.
True to form, Sharon has brutalized the Palestinian civilian population under the pretext of "self-defense". Armed and funded by Israel's wholly owned US Congress, the Israeli war machine can bulldoze Arab homes at will. The only weapon that the outgunned Palestinians can retaliate with is the "suicide bomber". With every suicide bombing, Sharon is able to "justify" even more attacks and occupy more land. The Zionist game plan is to ultimately drive the Palestinians out of the West Bank and Gaza, just like the Irgun massacres had driven the Arabs out of Deir Yassin. Standing in the way of such a bold Zionist scheme were three major obstacles:
1. the force of world opinion. Prior to 9-11, the Palestinian struggle against Israeli occupation had gained the sympathy of many people around the world.
2. the force of Israeli domestic opinion (most Israelis wanted peace and were opposed to the 35 year occupation of Palestinian territories).
3. Saddam Hussein‘s Iraq, which had always been a champion of the cause of Palestinian self determination.
How useful it would be for the Zionists if some "incident" were to happen which would turn American and world opinion against the Palestinians and ultimately drag the US into a war against Israel's Arab enemies.  Now you know why those Israelis were celebrating on 9-11!

ADVANCE WARNINGS

I giorni e le ore che precedettero l’11/9 furono scandite da una serie di segnalazioni circa futuri attacchi terroristici con l’impiego di aerei dirottati. E’ doveroso a questo punto ricordare che mesi prima dell’11/9, gli USA avevano già segnalato agli alleati l’esistenza di piani di guerra contro l’Afghanistan. Il 26 Giugno 2001 un giornale indiano (News Insight India Reacts) scriveva: “India e Iran faciliteranno i piani russo e americano di una azione militare limitata contro i Talebani...per farli retrocedere alla posizione tenuta nel 1998 cioè 50 Km da Mazar-e-Sharif..”. Il coinvolgimento futuro degli USA in Afghanistan era già stato segnalato in pubblicazioni inglesi e indiane ma mai sui giornali statunitensi. Con i piani già pronti dal Giugno 2001, tutto ciò che occorreva era un incidente per giustificare la “guerra contro il terrorismo” degli USA in Afghanistan.

The days and hours leading up to 9-11 were marked by a series of chilling warnings about impending terrorist plots involving hijacked commercial airplanes. It's worth mentioning at this point that months before 9-11, the US had already informed some of its allies of plans to go to war in Afghanistan. On June 26, 2001, News Insight/India Reacts, an Indian public affairs magazine, wrote: "India and Iran will "facilitate" US and Russian plans for "limited military action" against the Taliban if the contemplated tough new economic sanctions don't bend Afghanistan's fundamentalist regime.  Indian officials say that India and Iran will only play the role of "facilitator" while the US and Russia will combat the Taliban from the front with the help of two Central Asian countries, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, to push Taliban lines back to the 1998 position 50 km away from Mazar-e-Sharief city in northern Afghanistan. Military action will be the last option though it now seems scarcely avoidable with the UN banned from Taliban-controlled areas"  
The story of US military involvement in Afghanistan was reported months before 9-11 in Indian and British publications but it was never reported in the US media. With the military plans already in motion since at least June of 2001, all that was needed was for an "incident" to take place to justify the US going to "war against Terrorism" in Afghanistan.

L’autore riporta poi alcuni esempi degli avvertimenti circa gli attentati futuri. Il London Daily Telegraph il 16/09/01 scriveva: “…due uomini esperti nel Mossad erano andati a Washington nell’AGOSTO per avvertire FBI e CIA dell’esistenza di una cellula di 200 terroristi che stava preparando una grossa azione. Essi non avevano informazioni su che cosa era stato organizzato ma legarono il complotto a Osama Bin Laden e, sulla base di forti sospetti, all’Iraq”. Come è possibile che il Mossad conoscesse l’esistenza di questi 200 terroristi ma non era capace di fare un nome o di localizzarne uno? E quanto conveniente era per Israele che Bin Laden risultasse in complotto con l’Iraq, nonostante il fatto che Bin Laden e Hussein si odiano. L’autore quindi elenca altri giornali che riportano la conoscenza del futuro attentato: Franfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (La rete spia di Echelon aveva fornito agli USA e ai servizi segreti israeliani avvertimenti su futuri attacchi terroristici su obiettivi statunitensi), il San Francisco Chronicle (Willie Brown, il primo speaker dell’assemblea della California, fu avvisato otto ore prima di stare attento ai voli dell’11/9), il Newsweek Magazine (Il 24/09/01, riportava che tre settimane prima ci fu un’altra segnalazione di imminente attacco terroristico…e che il 10/09 un gruppo di alti Ufficiali del Pentagono avevano improvvisamente cancellato i piani di viaggio programmati per il mattino successivo, presumibilmente a causa di problemi di sicurezza) e il Washington Post (..due impiegati della Odigo ricevettero messaggi di segnalazione di un imminente attacco al WTC due ore prima dell’attacco stesso). Subito dopo l’attacco gli impiegati della Odigo informarono il servizio di gestione dei messaggi elettronici che avevano ricevuto il messaggio. I servizi di sicurezza israeliani furono contatti e l’FBI informata. Niente si è più sentito intorno a questo fatto.

Here are just a few of the advance warnings which were brought to light in the aftermath of 9-11:
The London Daily Telegraph reported on September 16, 2001: "The Telegraph has learned that two senior experts with Mossad, the Israeli military intelligence service, were sent to Washington in August to alert the FBI and CIA to the existence of a cell of as many as 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation. They had no specific information about what was being planned but linked the plot to Osama Bin Laden and told American officials that there were strong grounds for suspecting Iraqi involvement."  Do you smell a "false flag" operation in the works? How is possible that the Mossad knew of the existence of these 200 terrorists but could not name or locate a single one? And how convenient for Israel that Saddam Hussein should be in cahoots with Osama Bin Laden, despite the fact that Bin Laden and Hussein hate each other!
The Franfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, (FAZ) one of Germany’s most respected newspapers, quoted German intelligence sources who said that the Echelon electronic spy network gave US and Israeli intelligence agencies several warnings that suicidal hijack attacks were being planned against US targets. Echelon is capable of monitoring all of the electronic communication in the world. Utilizing 120 satellites, the Echelon system is designed to suck up enormous amounts of data by using keyword search techniques to sift through the data.
The San Francisco Chronicle reported on September 12 that San Francisco Mayor and former California Assembly Speaker Willie Brown was advised eight hours before the attacks that he should be careful about flying on 9-11.
In its September 24, 2001 issue, Newsweek Magazine broke this startling revelation: "Three weeks ago there was another warning that a terrorist strike might be imminent… On September 10, Newsweek has learned, a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly cancelled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns.". (emphasis added)
Wow! Could these unnamed "top Pentagon officials" have been some of the Zionist directors of the Defense Policy Board which we talked about earlier? If these Pentagon officials were scared enough not to fly, then why didn’t the Pentagon place the Air Force on full alert? How could they have been so slow to react to 9-11 when they already knew there was a threat?
On September 27, The Washington Post reported that two workers of the Israeli company Odigo (with offices also in New York) received instant message warnings just two hours before the attacks. Here’s an excerpt from the Washington Post:"Officials at instant-messaging firm Odigo confirmed today that two employees received text messages warning of an attack on the World Trade Center two hours before terrorists crashed planes into the New York landmarks"
Soon after the attacks, the Odigo employees informed the management of the electronic message they had received. Israeli security services were contacted and the FBI was informed. Nothing has been heard about this event since. I think it's safe to say that "Islamic terrorists" would not have been considerate enough to send detailed E-mail warnings to some obscure Israeli office workers.



THE SEPTEMBER 11 DANCE PARTY

Riassumiamo quello che si è imparato. Abbiamo chiaramente stabilito: che i Sionisti giocarono un ruolo chiave nel portare gli USA nelle 2 guerre mondiali; che ai Sionisti non interessa se gli Americani (e altri) sono uccisi per i loro scopi; che i Sionisti hanno attaccato gli Americani per poi far ricadere le colpe sugli arabi; che i Sionisti sono capaci di atti di indescrivibile brutalità e di genocidio; che i politici americani hanno paura della Mafia Sionista; che vi furono avvertimenti di un complotto di dirottatori suicidi; che i Sionisti possono far scomparire queste sbalorditive notizie dai giornali da loro controllati.

Let us review what we have learned. We have clearly established that Zionists played a key role in steering the US into two World Wars. We have clearly established that Zionists do not care if Americans (or others) are killed to further their goals. We have clearly established that Zionists have a record of attacking Americans in order to frame Arabs. We have established that the Zionists are capable of acts of unspeakable brutality and genocide. We have established that US politicians fear the Zionist Mafia and defy them at their own peril. We have learned that warnings of a suicidal hijacking plot were issued to several people. And most importantly of all, we have clearly established that the Zionists have the capacity to make these amazing stories suddenly disappear from their controlled news media.

Possiamo allora facilmente dedurre per quale ragione i 5 agenti israeliani erano così felici di fronte agli attacchi dell’11/9: essi sapevano che gli Americani sarebbero diventati alleati incondizionati e fanatici avversari dei Mussulmani e degli Arabi. Il giorno degli attacchi il primo ministro israeliano, Benjamin Netanyahu, alla domanda che cosa avrebbe significato l’attacco per le relazioni USA-Israele rispose :”Buono.....beh, non è buono ma produrrà una immediata simpatia”. I 5 israeliani fecero un tale spettacolo che chi li vide si sentì di dover chiamare la polizia. Quando il loro furgone fu fermato, le prime parole dell’autista furono: “Siamo Israeliani. Non siamo il vostro problema. I vostri problemi sono i nostri. I palestinesi sono i vostri problemi”. Gli agenti dell’FBI si insospettirono quando rinvennero tagliacarte (gli stessi che si pensava avessero usato i dirottatori), 4700 dollari in un calzino e passaporti stranieri. I cani della polizia, addestrati ad individuare esplosivo, quando furono avvicinati al furgone, reagirono come se lo avessero odorato. I 5 israeliani lavoravano per la Urban Moving Systems: un americano impiegato nella stessa ditta dichiarò che la maggioranza dei suoi collaboratori era israeliana e che tutti loro avevano gioito dell’attacco. Alcuni giorni dopo l’attacco, il proprietario della Urban Moving Systems, DominicK Suter, abbandonò in fretta gli affari e gli USA. I 5 veterani dell’esercito israeliano (Mossad) furono tenuti in custodia per alcuni mesi e poi quietamente rilasciati.

Having established these precedents, we can now easily deduce that the reason why those five dancing Israeli agents who celebrated the 9-11 attacks were so happy is because they knew that Americans would now become unconditional supporters of their "Israeli ally" and fanatical haters of Muslims and Arabs. On the day of the attacks,  former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attack would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was "It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"
The five Israelis made such a spectacle that everyone who saw them felt compelled to call the police. According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the first words out of the driver's (Sivan Kurzberg) lying mouth were:  "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem."  The police and FBI field agents became really suspicious when they found box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives.
From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the Bergen Record that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were all joking about the attacks. The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me."
A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stuck in storage facilities.  The five Israeli army veterans (Mossad) were held in custody for several months before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days.

Immediatamente dopo gli attacchi, i media controllati dai Sionisti erano pieni di storie che legavano gli attacchi a Bin Laden. Ci veniva detto che la ragione per cui Bin Laden attaccava gli USA era il suo odio per la nostra libertà e la nostra democrazia. I Mussulmani erano “medioevali” e ci volevano distruggere per il nostro benessere. Ma Bin Laden ha sempre negato un suo ruolo negli attacchi e aveva suggerito una orchestrazione da parte del Mossad: “Non sono coinvolto negli attacchi dell’11 Settembre né ero a conoscenza degli attacchi. Esiste un governo dentro il governo degli USA. Gli USA dovrebbero cercare gli autori dentro se stessi; tra la gente che vuole fare del secolo attuale un secolo di conflitti tra Islam e Cristianità..Il sistema americano è totalmente controllato dagli Ebrei, la cui prima priorità è Israele, non gli USA”. Al momento attuale l’unica evidenza del coinvolgimento di Bin Laden è stato un video amatoriale, fortemente sospetto e scarsamente udibile; non vi sono prove circostanziate di un coinvolgimento di Al Qaeda, mentre vi sono prove sicure che la Mafia Sionista ha addossato colpe sugli arabi nei complotti contro gli USA.  


Immediately following the attacks, the Zionist controlled media was filled with stories linking the attacks to Bin Laden. TV talking-heads and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable. We were told that the reason Bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval" and they wanted to destroy us because of our wealth. But Bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the 9-11 attacks: "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks....The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered against Bin Laden was a highly suspicious, barely audible amateur video, that the Zionist dominated Pentagon just happened to find "lying around" in Afghanistan. Though there is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda "terrorist network" to these acts of terror; there is in fact a mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that the Zionist Mafia has been very busy framing Arabs for terror plots against America.

Chi pilotava realmente gli aerei?

WHO WAS REALLY FLYING THOSE PLANES ON 9-11?

Poche ore dopo l’attacco dell’11/9, le autorità trovarono all’aereoporto di Boston le "prove" sugli autori: una copia del Corano, istruzioni di volo per aerei commerciali, un calcolatore per il consumo del carburante, un auto contenente un manuale di volo in lingua araba. Che fortuna questi ritrovamenti!

Nel giro di pochi giorni tutti i dirottatori furono identificati e i loro volti mostrati in TV.

Infine veniva ritrovato, poco distante dalle Torri Gemelle, il passaporto di Mohammed Atta.

Tutti ritrovamenti che indirizzarono gli investigatori verso Usama Bin Laden.

Ma come è possibile che studenti arabi, che non avevano mai pilotato un aereo ma solo studiato su simulatori di volo, siano stati in grado di pilotare un jumbojet e con tale precisione? E infatti questo è impossibile e chi realmente pilotasse gli aerei rimane un mistero.

Per giunta ben 7 dei 19 dirottatori suicidi erano vivi e sani. Essi risultarono vittime di errori di identificazione (alcuni avevano subito il furto di passaporti; 4 di loro non erano mai stati negli USA). Solo i media e il governo degli Sati Uniti continuarono ad ignorare questi fatti, sostenendo di conoscere i dirottatori e che 15 di loro erano Sauditi. Il Direttore dell’FBI ammise però che alcuni dirottatori potevano aver usato false identità. E questo potrebbe apparire logico se si ipotizza che Bin Laden abbia cercato di nascondere le identità dei dirottatori al fine di non far arrivare a lui la colpa degli attentati. Ma allora perché usare identità false ma arabe; non era meglio l’uso di false identità come identità ad esempio turche o brasiliane.

Inoltre tutti questi "indizi" che porterebbero verso dirottatori musulmani, non provano niente.

Nel Febbraio 2000, i servizi segreti indiani arrestarono 11 presunti dirottatori musulmani che si pensava fossero uomini di Al Qaeda: tutti quanti risultarono successivamente di nazionalità israeliana. Essi dichiararono ripetutamente di essere musulmani ma erano tutti israeliani del West Bank e il governo israeliano premette per il loro rilascio. Chi erano questi 11 israeliani travestiti da uomini di Al Qaeda? Infiltrati? Israeliani travestiti per far ricadere la colpa sui musulmani? Ma quello che colpisce di più è che all’identificazione degli attentatori dell’11/9 hanno contribuito in modo determinante i Servizi Segreti Indiani, gli stessi servizi che confusero uomini israeliani per uomini di Al Qaeda, gli stessi Servizi Segreti che lavorano in stretta collaborazione con il Mossad, dato il comune odio per i pakistani.

L’autore si sofferma quindi su Mohamed Atta. Ricorda che gli fu rubato il passaporto nel 1999 (lo stesso passaporto che miracolosamente sopravviveva all’esplosione del WTC?), che era considerato un ragazzo molto timido, a disagio con le donne, cocco di mamma, apolitico, di buona famiglia egiziana, gentile. La sua trasformazione in un consumatore di vodka, in un grande conquistatore di donne, in un animale terrorista ricorda quella del Dr. Jekyll e Mister Hyde.
Atta, o qualcun altro con la sua identità, si iscrisse alla scuola di volo in Florida nel 2001 ma interruppe il corso in quanto doveva trasferirsi a Boston. Il Presidente della scuola di volo ha affermato che la sua scuola non prepara alla guida di jumbo jets e inoltre ha raccontato di un suo sorprendente incontro con Atta; infatti un giorno, sapendo che Atta era di Amburgo, gli rivolse domande in tedesco: come risposta "Atta" lo quardò con occhi freddi, non reagì e andò via. Questo episodio è molto simile a quello accaduto con Zacharias Moussaoui (il cosiddetto 20° dirottatore) quando il suo istruttore di volo del Minnesota cercò di parlare con lui in Francese che era la sua prima lingua. E’ veramente un gioco del destino che sia Atta che Moussaoui abbiano incontrato istruttori che conoscevano la loro lingua. Sia Atta che Moussaoui avrebbero potuto rispondere tranquillamente ai loro istruttori. Ma nessuno dei due rispose perché non potevano. Essi potevano dunque essere degli impostori con facce truccate. La loro missione era di fare ricadere le colpe sui due innocenti arabi, scelti probabilmente a caso dal Mossad. Il primo impostore creò il nuovo Atta usando il passaporto rubato nel 1999 (lo stesso passaporto ritrovato il 11/9). Quste considerazioni supportano quanto affermato dal padre di Atta che asserisce di aver parlato con il figlio il 12/9. Potrebbe essere stato ucciso nei giorni seguenti l’attentato? Agenti del Mossad furono arrestati dopo che avevano condotto una non precisata azione a Holliwood (Florida), la stessa piccola città dove stava Atta. Che cosa è accaduto al reale Atta? Secondo il padre dovremmo chiederlo al Mossad.

Così se non c’erano loro, chi c’era su quegli aerei?

Ci sono vari scenari possibili. Non è completamente scartabile l’ipotesi di qualche fanatico israeliano. Una nazione come Israele che appare capace di produrre estremisti sionisti assetati di sangue, criminali di guerra Irgun, terroristi del Mossad, assassini che uccidono un Primo Ministro israeliano sotto gli occhi della polizia, e assassini pazzi che conducono massacri di donne e bambini, può benissimo reclutare qualche fanatico per condurre attacchi suicidi. Se ancora non credi che gli israeliani possono architettare tale operazione, dovresti ricordarti del dr. Baruch Goldstein. Il 25 Febbraio del 1994, Goldstein entrò in una moschea affollata da centinaia di arabi nel West Bank e aprì il fuoco uccidendo 29 arabi e ferendone molti altri. Goldstein venne assalito e ucciso dalla folla. Goldstein con almeno 800 arabi di fronte non poteva certo pensar di uscirne vivo. Questo fu chiaramente un attacco suicida. E che cosa disse la madre di Goldstein? Che ne era orgogliosa. Altri ebrei hanno trasformato la sua tomba in un memoriale e messo su un sito web in suo onore che tra l’altro porta scritto "Numerose persone vengono da tutto il mondo per pregarlo ed onorare la sua memoria".

Perché qualcuno degli ammiratori di Goldstein non poteva pilotare gli aerei l’11/9?

C’è una osservazione collaterale che può o non può avere qualche significato. Uno dei due israeliani deceduti a bordo degli aerei dirottati si chiama Daniel Lewin (sul primo aereo che urtò le Torri Gemelle). Il News Sercice Ha‘aretz (israeliano) ha rivelato che Lewin era stato Ufficiale dell’unità di comando Sayeret Matkaln delle forze di difesa israeliane. Clamorosamente il nome di Lewis è stato omesso nell’elenco delle vittime dell’11 Settembre della CNN.

Altre possibilità riguardano gruppi politici o anche Arabi, inconsapevoli di quale fosse il reale scopo della loro missione. Nel mondo oscuro di certe operazioni nascoste, gli agenti non conoscono i motivi della loro missione.

In effetti tutte queste sono speculazioni ma una cosa è certa: i dirottatori non sono i diciannove uomini i cui volti sono stati mostrati in TV.!

Hours after the 9-11 attacks, authorities began to find clues conveniently left for them to stumble upon. The Boston Globe reported that a copy of the Koran, instructions on how to fly a commercial airplane and a fuel consumption calculator were found in a pair of bags meant for one of the hijacked flights that left from Logan. Leggi Authorities also received a "tip" about a suspicious white car left behind at Boston's Logan Airport. An Arabic-language flight training manual was found inside the car. Leggi How fortunate for investigators that the hijackers "forgot" to take their Koran and Arab flight manuals with them!  Within a few days, all "19 hijackers" were "identified" and their faces were plastered all over our television screens. Then, like a script from a corny "B" spy movie, the official story gets even more ridiculous. The passport of the supposed "ringleader" Mohammed Atta, somehow managed to survive the explosion, inferno, and smoldering collapse to be oh-so-conveniently "found" just a few blocks away from the World Trade Center! Leggi
It is obvious that this "evidence" was planted by individuals wishing to direct the blame towards Osama Bin Laden. How is it possible that Arab students who had never flown an airplane could take a simulator course and then fly jumbo jets with the skill and precision of "top-gun" pilots? It is not possible and the fact is, the true identities of the 9-11 hijackers remains a mystery. In the days following the disclosure of the "hijackers" names and faces, no less than 7 of the Arab individuals named came forward to protest their obvious innocence. 67 That's right! Seven of the nineteen "hijackers" are alive and well. They were victims of identity theft, some of whom had had their passports stolen. They were interviewed by several news organizations including the Telegraph of England. Here’s an excerpt from David Harrison’s Telegraph story entitled: Revealed: The Men With Stolen Identities:
"Their names were flashed around the world as suicide hijackers who carried out the attacks on America. But yesterday four innocent men told how their identities had been stolen…
The men - all from Saudi Arabia - spoke of their shock at being mistakenly named by the FBI as suicide terrorists. None of the four was in the United States on September 11 and all are alive in their home country."

The Telegraph obtained the first interviews with the men since they learnt that they were on the FBI's list of hijackers who died in the crashes in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
All four said that they were "outraged" to be identified as terrorists. One has never been to America and another is a Saudi Airlines pilot who was on a training course in Tunisia at the time of the attacks. Saudi Airlines said it was considering legal action against the FBI for seriously damaging its reputation and that of its pilots." 
Leggi 
The story of these identity thefts was also briefly reported by ABC Leggi and BBC (England) Leggi. The FBI does not deny this. Nobody denies this fact because it is easily verifiable. Instead, the US media and government just ignore this inconvenient little fact and keep right on repeating the monstrous lie that the hijacker identities are known and that 15 of them were Saudis.
CNN revealed that FBI director Robert Mueller openly admitted that some of the identities of the 9-11 hijackers are in question due to identity theft. Here’s what CNN reported on September 21:
FBI Director Robert Mueller has acknowledged that some of those behind last week's terror attacks may have stolen the identification of other people, and, according to at least one security expert, it may have been "relatively easy" based on their level of sophistication.  Leggi
This opens up a whole Pandora’s box of unanswered questions. First and foremost of which is this: why would Osama Bin laden, the Saudi Arabian caveman, steal identities? To cover his tracks you say? Next question: why would a Saudi Arabian, attempting to cover his tracks, steal the identities of....fellow Saudi Arabians??? What would be the point? Why go you through the trouble of stealing identities that would point back to you? Why not steal Greek identities, or Brazilian identities, or Turkish ones? A much more logical conclusion is that non-Arabs stole these identities as part of a "false flag" operation designed to point the blame at Arabs, and Saudi Arabs in particular.
What kind of a corrupt character is FBI boss Mueller? He initially admitted that false identities were involved with 9-11, but then he allows the media to keep naming these innocent, and alive, Arabs as the hijackers? Why doesn’t he correct them? More on the slimy Mr. Mueller later on!
Now I'm really going to rock your faith in the false religion of 9-11. In February of 2000, Indian intelligence officials detained 11 members of what they thought was an Al Qaeda hijacking conspiracy. It was then discovered that these 11 "Muslim preachers" were all Israeli nationals! India’s leading weekly magazine, The Week, reported:
"On January 12 Indian intelligence officials in Calcutta detained 11 foreign nationals for interrogation before they were to board a Dhaka-bound Bangladesh Biman flight. They were detained on the suspicion of being hijackers. "But we realized that they were tabliqis (Islamic preachers), so we let them go, said an Intelligence official."
The eleven had Israeli passports but were believed to be Afghan nationals who had spent a while in Iran. …Indian intelligence officials, too, were surprised by the nationality profile of the eleven. "They say that they have been on tabligh (preaching Islam) in India for two months. But they are Israeli nationals from the West Bank," said a Central Intelligence official. He claimed that Tel Aviv "exerted considerable pressure" on Delhi to secure their release. "It appeared that they could be working for a sensitive organization in Israel and were on a mission to Bangladesh," the official said."
Leggi
What were these 11 Israelis doing trying to impersonate Al Qaeda men? Infiltrating?...perhaps. Framing?...more likely. But the important precedent to understand is this: Israeli agents were once caught red handed impersonating Muslim hijackers!
This event becomes even more mind boggling when we learn that it was Indian Intelligence that helped the US to so quickly identify the "19 hijackers"! On April 3, 2002, Express India, quoting the Press Trust of India, revealed:
Washington, April 3: Indian intelligence agencies helped the US to identify the hijackers who carried out the deadly September 11 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, a media report said here on Wednesday. Leggi
Ain't that a kick in the ass?!!  Did you catch that? The Indian intelligence officials that were duped into mistaking Israeli agents for Al Qaeda hijackers back in 2000-  were the very same clowns telling the FBI who it was that hijacked the 9-11 planes!  Keep in mind that Indian intelligence has an extremely close working relationship with Israel’s Mossad because both governments hate the Muslim nation of Pakistan. Leggi

Now about Mohamed Atta, you know, the so-called "ring leader". There are a number of inconsistencies with that story as well. Like some of the 7 hijackers known to be still alive, Atta also had his passport stolen in 1999, Leggi (the same passport that miraculously survived the WTC explosion and collapse?) making him an easy mark for an identity theft. Atta was known to all as a shy, timid, and sheltered young man who was uncomfortable with women. 76  The 5'7" 150 pound architecture student was such a "goody two shoes" that some of his university acquaintances in Germany refrained from drinking or cursing in front of him. How this gentle, non- political mamma's boy from a good Egyptian family suddenly transformed himself into the vodka drinking, go-go girl groping terrorist animal described by the media, has to rank as the greatest personality change since another classic work of fiction, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
Atta, or someone using Atta's identity, had enrolled in a Florida flight school in 2001 and then broke off his training, making it a point to tell his instructor he was leaving for Boston. In an October 2001 interview with an ABC affiliate in Florida, flight school president Rudi Dekkers said that his course does not qualify pilots to fly commercial jumbo jets. 77 He also described Atta as "an asshole". 78  Part of the reason for Dekker's dislike for Atta stems from a highly unusual incident that occurred at the beginning of the course. Here’s the exchange between ABC producer Quentin McDermott and Dekkers:
MCDERMOTT: "Why do you say Atta was an asshole?"
DEKKERS: "Well, when Atta was here and I saw his face on several occasions in the building, then I know that they're regular students and then I try to talk to them, it's kind of a PR - where are you from… I tried to communicate with him. I found out from my people that he lived in Hamburg and he spoke German so one of the days that I saw him, I speak German myself, I'm a Dutch citizen, and I started in the morning telling him in German, "Good morning. How are you? How do you like the coffee? Are you happy here?", and he looked at me with cold eyes, didn't react at all and walked away. That was one of my first meetings I had." 79
This is eerily similar to the way in which Zacharias Moussaoui (the so-called "20th hijacker) became "belligerent" when his Minnesota flight instructor tried to speak to him in French (his first language), at the beginning of that course. The Minnessota Star Tribune reported on December 21, 2001:
"Moussaoui first raised eyebrows when, during a simple introductory exchange, he said he was from France, but then didn't seem to understand when the instructor spoke French to him. Moussaoui then became belligerent and evasive about his background, (Congressman) Oberstar and other sources said. In addition, he seemed inept in basic flying procedure, while seeking expensive training on an advanced commercial jet simulator."  80    (emphasis added)
It truly is an amazing twist of fate that both Ata and Moussaoui both had American flight instructors who spoke German and French respectively. Even the great Mossad could not have foreseen such a coincidence! The real Atta would have been able to respond to his instructor’s German small talk and the real Moussaoui would have been able to respond to his instructor’s French small talk. Ata just walked away and Moussaoui threw a fit!  Neither responded because neither could. They were imposters, whose faces were probably disguised by a make up artist.  Their mission  was to frame the two innocent Arabs who were probably targeted by the Mossad at random. 
The imposter was able to create a new Ata by using Atta's stolen passport from 1999 - the same passport that floated safely to the ground with a few burnt edges on 9-11. These strange inconsistencies tend to give support to Mohammed Atta's father's claim that he spoke over the phone with his son on September 12th, the day after the attacks. 81  Could a group of professionals have abducted and killed the real Atta in the days following the 9-11 attacks? Mossad agents, posing as "art students" were arrested after conducting some type of operation in Hollywood, Florida, the same small town that Atta stayed in! 82 So what happened to the real Mohammed Atta? To quote his grief stricken father: "Ask Mossad!".
So who, if not the "19 Arabs" was on those planes? That’s the million dollar question! There are a number of alternative scenarios. Could some Israelis have been fanatical enough to have volunteered for such a suicide mission? Odd as that may sound at first, it is not out of the realm of possibility. The fact is, hard-core Zionist extremists have proven themselves to be every bit as fanatical, (more so), than Arab extremists.
A nation which can produce thousands of bloodthirsty Zionist extremists,  Irgun war criminals, Mossad terrorists who blow up occupied buildings, assassins who kill Israeli Prime Ministers in full view of policemen, and crazed killers who have carried sickening massacres of Arab women and children; would surely be capable of recruiting a few  fanatics willing to sacrifice for "the cause".  This theory becomes even more plausible when we consider that only the pilots would have needed to know that the planes were on a suicide mission.
Still don’t think Israel is capable of producing suicidal terrorists? Have you already forgotten the case of Dr. Baruch Goldstein?. Goldstein was a New York doctor and  resettled in Israel. On February 25, 1994, Goldstein walked into a crowded Arab mosque in the occupied West Bank.  With hundreds of worshippers kneeled in silent prayer, Goldstein sealed off the exit, and opened fire with a rapid-firing assault rifle, killing 29 and wounding many more. Goldstein, a father of four, was finally stopped and killed when the frenzied crowd overpowered him. With as many as 800 worshippers packed into the mosque, Goldstein surely could not have been expecting to come out alive. This was clearly a suicide attack. And what did Goldstein’s mother have to say about her son’s suicide attack? The Boston Globe revealed:
"The mother of Baruch Goldstein, the Jewish settler who massacred about 40 Palestinians in a Hebron mosque a week ago, says she is proud of her son. "I always thought to myself, 'When would someone get up and do such a thing?' And in the end, my son did it," Miriam Goldstein told the weekly Shishi newspaper." 83
It gets even more sickening than that. Baruch Goldstein has become a folk hero among many of the crazed side-locked settlers who have encroached upon the West Bank. They have turned Goldstein’s gravesite into a memorial and set up a website to honor his murderous deed! Look what these fanatics posted on the Goldstein memorial website:
"Over the years, the grave has become a site of pilgrimage. Numerous people from all over the world come to pray and honor his (Baruch’s) memory.  84
(emphasis added)

One has to wonder if some of Goldstein’s admirers were flying those planes on 9-11. There is one interesting side note here which may or may not be of any significance. One of the two Israelis who died aboard the hijacked planes was Daniel Lewin - who was aboard the first plane to crash into the Twin Towers. The Ha‘aretz News Service of Israel revealed that Lewin,  was a one-time officer in the Israeli Defense Forces elite Sayeret Matkal commando unit. 85 Oddly enough, Lewin’s name is missing from CNN’s comprehensive September 11 Memorial website.
Another possibility is that some other group of "patsies" was recruited for the operation. Perhaps some anarchists,  or some leftover Marxists who thought they were going to bring down western capitalism. Or perhaps, the hijackers were another group of angry  Arabs who weren’t even aware of who their true handlers really were or what the broader strategic aim of the mission actually was. In the dark world of covert operations, agents are often kept ignorant of who it is that orchestrating the show.
Admittedly, these scenarios are speculative, but one thing that is not speculative is this: the hijackers were not the 19 men whose faces were shown on our TV screens!

Chi ha protetto l’operazione dell’11 Settembre?

 

Il 26/10/99, il famoso golfista, Payne Stewart, si imbarcò in Florida su un jet privato diretto in Texas. Subito dopo il decollo, il jet virò bruscamente e prese la rotta verso Nord-Ovest. Tutti i contatti con la torre di controllo si interruppero. Entro 15 minuti da quando il jet andò fuori rotta, i caccia statunitensi lo avevano già intercettato. I passeggeri erano probabilmewnte morti a causa della depressurizzazione. I caccia furono inviati dal NORAD, la branca delle forze aeree degli USA, il cui compito è il monitoraggio e la difesa dello spazio aereo, 24 ore al giorno. Il NORAD ha un enorme dispiegamento di radar terrestri, ed ha caccia allertati 24 ore al giorno, così da rispondere rapidamente in caso di crisi. I caccia scortarono l’aereo finchè esso precipitò a causa della mancanza di carburante. Il tempo di reazione così rapido e la precisione militare furono impressionanti come esattamente uno dovrebbe aspettarsi dalla più grande potenza militare del mondo.

Ma l’11 Settembre lo stesso NORAD, per due ore, era come se non ci fosse: due ore è il periodo che intercorre tra i primi aerei dirottati e l’aereo caduto in Pennsylvania. Come è stato possibile che un territorio aereo compreso fra Boston e Washington (un’area che comprende il cuore politico e economico del paese) sia stata lasciata completamente senza difesa? Il secondo aereo che urtò le Torri gemelle volò fuori rotta per 40 minuti senza comunicazioni con la torre di controllo. Nel suo tragitto verso New York volò a poche miglia di distanza dalla base delle forze aere McGuire nel New Jersey, e dopo che la prima torre era già stata colpita! E come è possibile che anche Washington sia stata lasciata indifesa quando la base delle forze aeree Andrews era a breve distanza e dopo che già era avvenuto l’attentato alle Torri Gemelle? E’ questo dovuto ad una incapacità del NORAD o c’era un ordine per far decollare in ritardo i caccia? Dato la performance del NORAD nel caso di Payne Stewart, questo suggerirebbe che qualcuno in alto nelle Forze Aeree possa aver dato certi ordini alle basi aeree interessate. Ricordiamoci che il Ministero della Difesa del Pentagono è diretto dal "Zionist" Richard Perle e dalla sua "gang" di lacchè guerrafondai. E’ così difficile da credere che un alto capo militare possa aver collaborato?

Ciò che rende questa lenta risposta delle forze armate aeree particolarmente difficile da digerire (e sospetta) è che in un articolo del Newsweek (precedentemente citato) veniva riportato che alcuni capi del Pentagono (Ministero della Difesa?) avevano cancellato i propri piani di volo per motivi di sicurezza. C’erano altri segnali di pericolo come già detto precedentemente. Alla luce di tutto ciò, perché il NORAD e la sua armata non era nel massimo stato di allerta? C’è solo una logica risposta a queste domande: Certi capi del Pentagono erano "al corrente".

Il Generale Hamid Gul, ex Direttore dei Servizi Segreti Pakistani ha affermato: " Gli attacchi contro New York e Washington sono stati progettati dagli Israeliani …..Gli attacchi iniziarono alle 8,45; 4 voli furono dirottati dai loro assegnati spazi aerei e nessun caccia si alzò in volo fino alle ore 10. I radar erano bloccati, i trasponditori non funziovano, e non ci fu nessuna intimazione tipo IFF (= corrispondente ad un messaggio di altolà). In Pakistan se non c’è risposta a un IFF, i caccia si alzano in volo instantaneamente. Questo allora è chiaramente un lavoro interno. Questo sarà taciuto nell’investigazione..?".

Queste osservazioni ci pongono una serie di domande. Gli orchestratori degli attentati avranno speso un po’ del loro tempo, per conoscere qualcosa delle procedure di difesa aerea statunitense. Avranno allora realizzato che colpire New York con jet dirottati da Boston sarebbe risultato molto difficile. New York è distante circa 30 minuti e i jet dirottati avrebbero volato molto lentamente in confronto ai caccia statunitensi che possono superare il muro del suono. Perfino con 15-20 minuti di vantaggio iniziale, i caccia del NORAD li avrebbero facilmente intercettati, in particolare avrebbero intercettato il secondo aereo, che prese un tragitto molto più lungo per raggiungere New York (volò fuori rotta per 40 minuti). Perché allora scegliere l’aeroporto di Boston e mettere in pericolo il successo dell’operazione? Non sarebbe stato più semplice dirottare gli aerei dagli aeroporti Kennedy o La Guardia di New York? O meglio ancora da Newark, in quanto New York si trova appena al di là del fiume. Qualunque aereo dirottato da uno di questi aeroporti sarebbe stato imprendibile. Ma anche un aereo da Philadelphia si sarebbe trovato più vicino al bersaglio rispetto a Boston.

Gli ideatori non erano così stupidi. Essi dovevano dunque contare su una qualche copertura protettiva in qualche personaggio di alto grado nel Comando Aereo Statunitense. Perché altrimenti avrebbero scelto Boston?

In aggiunta alla possibile protezione ricevuta, cè un’altra plausibile ipotesi del perché è stato scelto l’aeroporto Logan di Boston, così come sono stati scelti aerei della United and American Aerlines. Si deve infatti notare che la ditta che provvede alla sicurezza dell’aeroporto Logan di Boston (ma anche dell’aereoporto Newark) e che lavora anche per la United and American Aerlines è una compagnia chiamata Huntleigh USA. Dire che la Huntleigh USA fu gravemente carente nelle sue funzioni di controllo è una cosa ovvia, testimoniata anche dal fatto che familiari di alcune vittime hanno intentato una causa contro di essa. La Huntleigh USA è stata acquisita nel 1999 dalla ICTS International, che è controllata da due israeliani: Ezra Harel e Menachem Atzmon. In breve, la sicurezza all’aeroporto di Boston era controllata da una compagnia a sua volta controllata da israeliani. C’è qualche collegamento? Potrebbero alcuni agenti essersi infiltrati nell’aeroporto sotto la copertura della Huntleigh USA? E’ proprio possibile. Nei giorni seguenti l’11 Settembre, professionisti della sicurezza israeliani chiesero di gestire la sicurezza di vari aeroporti statunitensi. Gli americani dovrebbero essere grati a questi meravigliosi alleati che vogliono pensare alla sicurezza dei nostri aeroporti.

Potrebbe la deficienza nel nostro sistema di difesa essere attribuito ad un attacco ad opera di hacker. La nostra difesa e i nostri servizi dipendono molto dalla tecnologioa. Un attacco ben coordinato su questi sistemi potrebbe spiegare la nostra incapacità di prevenire e rispondere agli attacchi. C’è un gruppo che ha la capacità di atttaccare i nostri sistemi informatici militari. Nel Luglio 1999, Ha’aretz (Israele) riportò una storia intitolata " Hackers usano sito internet israeliano per attaccare il Pentagono ". Ha’aretz riportava. "Un sito internet israeliano è stato usato da hacker internazionali come base per attacchi elettronici contro il governo e i sistemi di computer militari americani; la notozia è stata riferita da ufficili del Pentagono sul Washington Times". "In accordo al Times, il danno reale alla sicurezza nazionale degli USA è la possibilità che governi o servizi segreti possano lanciare una guerra elettronica contro gli Stati Uniti".

E consideriamo inoltre ciò che il Dipartimento di Giustizia statunitense scrisse nel 1998: "Il Dipartimento di Giustizia, in accordo con l’FBI, l’Ufficio di Investigazioni Speciali delle Forze Aeree, l’Amministrazione Spaziale e Aereonautica Nazionale, e il Servizio Investigativo Criminale della Marina, hanno annunciato oggi che la Polizia Nazionale Israeliana ha arrestato Ehud Tenebaum, un cittadino israeliano, per accesso illegale ai computer dei governi israeliano e statunitense, così come a centinaia di altri sistemi di educazione e commerciali negli USA e altrove".

Nesssun dubbio su questo. Elementi nascosti isrealiani hanno bersagliato i sistemi di difesa militari degli Stati Uniti. E questo potrebbe essere stato un altro strumento giocato durante l’orchestrazione dell’11 Settembre.


 

I documenti citati possono essere richiesti alla Redazione oppure scaricati dal sito www.whatreallyhappened.com.

 

Il Curioso Collasso delle Torri Gemelle.


La versione ufficiale degli eventi fornita dai media e dal governo insiste sul fatto che le alte temperature sprigionatesi dopo l’impatto causarono lo scioglimento dei supporti in acciaio del World Trade Center, così che si ebbe il colasso totale delle torri. Questa è una teoria strana per una serie di ragioni:

  1. Gli architetti che progettarono il World Trade Center lo fecero in modo tale da prevedere le conseguenze (e il fuoco sprigionato dal carburante) nel caso di un impatto con un aereo di linea commerciale . Aaron Swirsky, uno degli architetti, ha descritto il collasso come "incredibile". Lee Robertson, l’ingegnere del progetto strutturale, disse: "Io l’ho progettato per l’impatto con un 707. Il Boeing 707 ha una capacità di serbatoio comparabile a quella del 767";
  2. Nella storia di incendi di alte costruzioni non c’è un caso di collasso a causa dello scioglimento delle strutture d’acciaio ;
  3. Il collasso delle torri fu perfettamente simmetrico e ordinato, e praticamente identico ad una controllata implosione. Una compagnia di demolizione non avrebbe fatto meglio.


The government/media approved version of events insists that the fires in the World Trade Center burned so hot that they caused  steel supports to melt and buckle, thus triggering a total collapse of the towers. This is a strange theory for a number of reasons:
1. The architects who designed the World Trade Center designed it to withstand the direct impact and fuel fire of a commercial airline crash. Aaron Swirsky, one of the architects of the WTC described the collapse as "incredible" and "unbelievable." 96
Lee Robertson, the project's structural engineer said: "I designed it for a 707 to hit it. The Boeing 707 has a fuel capacity comparable to the 767." 97
2. The history of high-rise building fires provides no case histories of buildings collapsing due to steel beams melting from a fire.
3. The collapse of both towers were both perfectly symmetrical and methodical. The straight down collapse was identical in appearance to a well engineered, controlled implosion. A demolition company could not have done it better. Now that we know that all one has to do to bring a tall building straight down is set a fuel fire in it, the well trained experts who work for demolition companies should all be out of a job by now!

Perfino un profano con nessuna conoscenza di esplosivi sarebbe capace di capire questo. In ogni caso, molti specialisti in esplosivi e ingegneria strutturale hanno fatto queste osservazioni. Dopo il crollo del WTC, il vicepresidente del New Mexico, Van Romero, in una intervista al Albuquerque Journal, affermava che il collasso era troppo ordinato e che esplosivo era stato piazzato in punti chiave di entrambe le costruzioni. Romero affermò: "Appare difficile credere che qualcosa dell’aereo abbia scatenato un tale evento. Ci potrebbe essere stato una piccola quantità di esplosivo piazzato in punti strategici. Una delle cose per cui i terroristi sono noti è di avere un attacco diversivo e un piano secondario". Alcuni giorni dopo quell’intervista, Romero affermò al Albuquerque Journal di non credere più che le bombe siano state le responsabili del crollo. Secondo l’Autore, tale cambiamento di opinione sarebbe dovuto al fatto che Romero aveva necessità di finanziamenti dal Pentagono ("occupato dai Sionisti") per un progetto di Difesa nel New Mexico.


Even a layman with no explosives background should be able to see this. But many specialists  in the explosives and structural engineering have also made this observation and commented on these inconsistencies. After the WTC collapse, the Vice President of New Mexico Tech, Van Romero, gave an interview to the Albuquerque Journal. He stated plainly that he believed that the WTC collapse was too methodical  and that explosive devices must have been placed in key points of both buildings. Romero said:
"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that. It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points. One of the things that terrorists are noted for is a diversionary attack and a secondary device." 98
In that same interview, Romero revealed that he was in Washington DC when the attacks took place. He and a colleague were there to discuss defense research programs for New Mexico Tech.  A few days after his interview, Romero abruptly changed his opinion and told the Albuquerque Journal that he no longer believed that bombs brought down the towers. 99 Romero, who relies upon the Zionist occupied Pentagon for funding, had suddenly flip-flopped and joined the "melted steel" theorists.


Parecchi testimoni e sopravvissuti hanno riferito di aver udito scoppi di bombe all’interno del WTC . Louie Cacchioli è un pompiere di Harlem, New York, che disse al People Magazine: "Stavo portando i pompieri al 24.mo piano per evacuare i lavoratori. Nell’ultimo viaggio scoppiò una bomba. Pensiamo che fossero bombe collocate nella costruzione".


There is more than just my own common sense and Romero's expert opinion to support the belief that the towers were imploded from within. Several witnesses and survivors reported hearing bombs going off inside the World Trade Center. Louie Cacchioli is a firefighter with Engine 47 in Harlem, New York. Cacchioli told People Magazine the following:
"I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building." 100


Questa controversia tra lo scenario "scioglimento dell’acciaio" e lo scenario "detonazione" poteva essere facilmente risolto. Tutto quello che dovevamo fare era riportare alla luce l’intelaiatura d’acciaio ed esaminarla. Allora avremmo facilmente visto se la causa del crollo era stata l’esplosivo o l’incendio. Insomma per mettere la parola fine su questa discussione ciò che dobbiamo fare è vedere l’acciaio. Giusto?

Bene, non trattenere il fiato. Questo non avverrà. Grazie, in gran parte, all’Uomo dell’Anno 2001, secondo il Time Magazine, e cioè il sindaco di New York, Rudolph Giuliani, l’intelaiatura d’acciaio è stata rapidamente riciclata prima che gli investigatori potessere avere una qualche chanche di esaminarla. Molto dell’acciaio fu riciclato in America ma 70 mila tonnelate furono vendute alla Metals Management, una compagnia di New York con un presidente ebreo (sionista?) di nome Alan Ratner, che lo trasportò in Cina e in India per il riciclaggio.

L’edizione inglese della Radio Cinese Internazionale riportò: "La Metals Management di New York è fra le industrie che hanno preso l’acciaio dal grandioso progetto di pulire Ground Zero. La compagnia ha detto di aver preso 70000 tonnellate di rottami dalle torri genelle distrutte. Una parte dei detriti sono stati trasportati attraverso il Pacifico in Asia, compreso la Cina e l’India. Fra i detriti consegnati vi sono le travi d’acciaio che potrebbero alla fine portare da 250000 a 400000 tonnelate di detriti per il riciclaggio".


Now this whole controversy between the "melted steel" scenario and the detonation scenario is one that could be very easily resolved. All we have to do is dig up the steel beams and examine each and everyone of them. If an explosive device caused the steel to fail, there will be tell-tale indications for the engineers to see. But if it was intense heat that caused the steel to "melt" or "buckle", there will be tell-tale signs of that as well. All we have to do to put an end to this controversy is to closely examine the steel. Right?
Well, don't hold your breath. That's never going to happen. Thanks in large part to Time Magazine's "Man of the Year 2001", New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, the steel beams were quickly recycled before investigators even had the chance to look at them! A media darling and lifelong supporter of Israel, Saint Rudy Giuliani made sure that the "smoking gun" evidence was destroyed and right quick too. Much of the steel was recycled in America, but an additional seventy thousand tons of WTC steel was sold to Metals Management - a New York company with a jewish (Zionist?) president named Alan Ratner. Ratner then turned around and shipped the WTC’s steel to China and India for recycling! 101

China Radio International’s English Edition  also reported:
"New York's Metals Management is among the firms taking steel from the huge project to clear Ground Zero. The company says it has bought 70,000 tons of scrap from the ruined twin towers. Some of the scrap has been shipped across the Pacific to Asian, including China and India. Among the consignments of scrap are the "very dense" steel girders from Ground Zero, which could finally yield 250,000 to 400,000 tons of scrap for recycling." 102

Così agli investigatori non fu permesso di vedere la più importante du tutte le prove: l’acciaio. Nel tempo in cui San Rudolph Giuliani e Ratner, il Riciclatore, distruggevano le prove, molti tra i più rispettati ingegneri del paese si lamentavano non solo per il riciclaggio ma anche perché il governo federale controllava in modo soffocante la loro inchiesta. Il 25 Dicembre 2001, il New York Times pubblicò un articolo sulla frustazione di alcuni degli ingegneri chiamati a investigare le cause del collasso, i quali "erano stati varie volte ostacolati da restrizioni burocratiche che impedivano di intervistare testimoni, esaminare il luogo del disastro e richiedere importanti informazioni come le chiamate registrate alla polizia e ai pompieri".

Imaine that! The largest criminal investigation in history and the investigators weren't even permitted to see the most important evidence of all - the steel! During the time that Saint Rudy and Ratner the Recycler were destroying evidence, many of the most respected engineers in the country complained not only about the recycling, but also about the Federal government's suffocating control of their investigation. On December 25, 2001, the New York Times ran a story about the frustrations of some of the engineers who were called in to study the cause of the collapse:
"Interviews with a handful of members of the team, which includes some of the nation's most respected engineers, also uncovered complaints that they had at various times been shackled with bureaucratic restrictions that prevented them from interviewing witnesses, examining the disaster site and requesting crucial information like recorded distress calls to the police and fire departments..."  103 .


Essi espressero il loro disappunto pubblicamente. Bill Manning, editore del Fire Engineering Magazine, ha notato una strana differenza fra le indagini condotte sul WTC e quelle di altre investigazioni su incendi in New York, affermando che "la rimozione e la distruzione delle prove doveva fermarsi immediatamente". Uno degli investigatori disse al New York Times: "C’è un team da sogno di ingegneri che lavorano su questo, ma le loro mani sono legate", ha riferito un membro della squadra che chiede di restare anonimo. I membri sono stati minacciati di non parlare con la stampa pena il licenziamento. "Il FEMA (Agenzia Federale per la Gestione delle Emergenze) sta controllando tutto" disse il componente del team. Il Dr Frederick W. Mowrer del dipartimento delle tecniche antincendio dell’Università del Maryland disse al New York Times: "Trovo terrificante la velocità con cui è stata rimossa e riciclata questa importante prova". Infine il Times espose questa interessante piccola rivelazione su San Rudy il Riciclatore: "Funzionari dell’ufficio del sindaco si rifiutarono di rispondere a richieste scritte e orali su chi aveva deciso di riciclare l’acciaio e che tale azione aveva potuto ostacolare le indagini". E’ una forma molto strana di scienza quella che il governo e alcuni scienziati praticano in questi giorni. Senza un briciolo di prova obbiettiva, questi alchimisti dei tempi moderni sono stati capaci di "provare" la loro teoria che il fuoco ha causato il crollo delle Torri Gemelle. E questa appare essere un’altra mostruosa bugia. Perché altrimenti avrebbero distrutto l’acciaio fuso? Chiedetelo a Rudy.


They made their concerns known publicly. Bill Manning, editor of the 125 year old Fire Engineering magazine, noticed a strange difference between the WTC investigation and other major fire investigations in New York City’s history. Manning wrote:
"Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle Shirtwaist fire? Did they throw away the gas can used at the happy land social club fire?...That's what they're doing at the World Trade Center. The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately." 104
One investigator told the New York Times:
"This is almost the dream team of engineers in the country working on this, and our hands are tied," said one team member who asked not to be identified. Members have been threatened with dismissal for speaking to the press. "FEMA is controlling everything," the team member said. " 105
Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer from the Fire Engineering department at the University of Maryland told the New York Times:
"I find the speed with which important evidence has been removed and recycled to be appalling." 106
Finally, the Times story made this interesting little revelation about St. Rudy the Recycler:
"Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to written and oral requests for comment over a three- day period about who decided to recycle the steel and the concern that the decision might be handicapping the investigation.." 107
It is a very odd form of science that the government and some of its house scientists practice these days. Without a shred of physical evidence, these modern-day alchemists have been able to "prove" their theory fire caused the towers to collapse. This appears to be yet another monstrous lie. Why else would you destroy the "melted steel"?
Ask Rudy.

Da "Stranger than fiction": una interpretazione indipendente dei fatti (whatreallyhappened.com, site anti-war and anti-lie. The purpose of this site is to expose deceptions by governments and media used to trick the public into wars and out of their money).

 

Torna alla pagina principale